
Lightweight Radius Arms
#1
Posted 26 September 2008 - 11:27 AM
I've seen KAD make lightweight aluminium radius arms, about half the weight of standard, but £350
Has anyone tried to, or seen self fabricate readius arms, I was thinking tubular section with inside bored to take roller or plain bearings, and then box section back to another piece of tubular steel for the rear.
Obviously the joints would be seam welded and strengthened/braced, and then threaded holes added to bolt bits and pieces to, (hand brake quadrants and the like.
I'm sure it could be made much lighter then the standard parts, as the radius arms are much heavier then the subframe.
Advantages would be huge with a beam axle and box section radius arms?
Dave
#2
Posted 26 September 2008 - 11:37 AM

#3
Posted 26 September 2008 - 11:42 AM
Any more pics, or anything with them not in the car. And do you know how much they weigh?
I was thinking it must be easy to make a jig using standard items, and then weld a few bits of tubular steel together.
Makes me wonder why the original fitment are big cast items.
Dave
#4
Posted 26 September 2008 - 11:50 AM

#5
Posted 26 September 2008 - 11:54 AM
(I'm trying to work out what to do with the Hornet).
My thinking is rear subframe's aren't that heavy once the radius arms are off, so surely they're the better thing to change or lighten, especially as they're 'unsprung'.
Dave
#6
Posted 26 September 2008 - 12:17 PM
I assume you then have to fit coil over shock absorbers as you have a beam axle.
(I'm trying to work out what to do with the Hornet).
My thinking is rear subframe's aren't that heavy once the radius arms are off, so surely they're the better thing to change or lighten, especially as they're 'unsprung'.
Dave
yup have coilovers all round but those arms would go with a standard suspension set up if you could fab up a cone knuckle/rad arm thingy otherwise coilover only
Edited by maph2, 26 September 2008 - 12:20 PM.
#7
Posted 26 September 2008 - 12:26 PM
This is getting to sound like more and more work... Might start with standard parts, and use the dead subframe and radius arms to work out what's possible.
Dave
#8
Posted 26 September 2008 - 12:38 PM
#9
Posted 26 September 2008 - 02:23 PM
i would only bother if you were going to ditch rear frame, cut back rear seat, move battery (i am ), lightweight drums etc
for the cost, effort and general faffing, i'd be inclined to spend the money on fuel injecting the hornet - more economy, more power and torque
#10
Posted 29 September 2008 - 08:51 AM
suppose it depends what you are going to do with the hronet generally. i'm only usingt the lightweight arms because i had them. otherwise would use standard ones.
i would only bother if you were going to ditch rear frame, cut back rear seat, move battery (i am ), lightweight drums etc
for the cost, effort and general faffing, i'd be inclined to spend the money on fuel injecting the hornet - more economy, more power and torque
Already got an MG engine, and planning on some form of forced air induction, but we shall see...
Maybe fuel injection, I wonder what SPi/MPi parts I'd need... I hadn't thought of that...
#11
Posted 29 September 2008 - 11:14 AM
#12
Posted 29 September 2008 - 12:04 PM
#13
Posted 29 September 2008 - 02:29 PM
May stick with standard for the moment, and consider upgrading at a later date...
Will still have to take a look at how hard it would be to fabricate my own tubular jobbies. I'll have to take some measurements then get busy with Solidworks... And then try to find someone who'll make them for a small enough amount of money and produce a limited run... Hmmm...
Any other ideas?
#14
Posted 29 September 2008 - 02:57 PM
#15
Posted 29 September 2008 - 04:19 PM
That would mean having to weld the cast iron though - nearly impossible to do without specialist gear so that its strong enough to take the forces that'll get thrown at it.Simply keep the front part with the bearings and knuckle connectors, and then cut off the arm and hub, and replace these with box and tube.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users