D16 Conversion Help
#1
Posted 21 August 2008 - 12:33 PM
Has anyone here done it ?
How much roughly has it cost you?
Also has anyone made their own subframe?
Any pictures or links aswell please
#2
Posted 21 August 2008 - 12:39 PM
i know the B16 is a popular conversion, and the D16 is a similar unit but i dont know if anyone has used it... whats wrong with using a B16?? its a better unit than the D anyway
You can monify a metro subframe to accept the B16, or alternativly build your own or go to zcars.org... theres someone else making tubular subbies too but i forget the name... janspeed maybe
#3
Posted 21 August 2008 - 12:42 PM
#4
Posted 21 August 2008 - 12:50 PM
The D16 is actually the better alrounder providing much better torque lower down the revs and still revving to 7200 RPM.
However unless you are front fitting this i wouldn't reccommend having a RWD mini they just cant cope.
If you look in the projects sectin there are plenty of threads on fitting a VTec B16
#5
Posted 21 August 2008 - 12:55 PM
Depends how you look at it. D series engines are much much cheaper, you can pick versions up that are only 20-30bhp less than the B series, and I have a Vtec-E D series engine that only cost me £100 and has a 3.7 final drive as standard, making it extremely suitable for small Mini wheels. A B series on the other hand usually goes for £500+, and a suitable custom final drive will cost you another £500+.i know the B16 is a popular conversion, and the D16 is a similar unit but i dont know if anyone has used it... whats wrong with using a B16?? its a better unit than the D anyway
#6
Posted 21 August 2008 - 01:36 PM
From investigations i've done, unless you want over 200bhp, they'll handle anything you can throw at them.
Search Wikipedia "Honda d engine" for an overview.
#7
Posted 21 August 2008 - 02:29 PM
#8
Posted 21 August 2008 - 02:46 PM
the D16 is the better engine for everything but high power. seriously.
#9
Posted 21 August 2008 - 02:52 PM
Oh, did I mention I have a D series subframe for sale....
#10
Posted 21 August 2008 - 03:27 PM
do you still have that D16 Vtec or that other JDM engine you had??
#11
Posted 21 August 2008 - 03:35 PM
I still have the D series Vtec-E, waiting for me to decide whether I'm going to carry on with the Clubby project or not....
#12
Posted 21 August 2008 - 03:45 PM
(says with half a dozen old hondas in his ebay watch list)
I'd be interested in the engine jammy, very interested.
#13
Posted 21 August 2008 - 04:34 PM
JammyBasturd-I'm not interested at the moment because it's just an idea but how much were you looking for for the subframe? Do you think it would be hard to make your own subframe?
Thanks
#14
Posted 21 August 2008 - 04:52 PM
Depends how you look at it. D series engines are much much cheaper, you can pick versions up that are only 20-30bhp less than the B series, and I have a Vtec-E D series engine that only cost me £100 and has a 3.7 final drive as standard, making it extremely suitable for small Mini wheels. A B series on the other hand usually goes for £500+, and a suitable custom final drive will cost you another £500+.i know the B16 is a popular conversion, and the D16 is a similar unit but i dont know if anyone has used it... whats wrong with using a B16?? its a better unit than the D anyway
my mate has a B16A 120k miles (150bhp) complete for £250 and another friend has the bottom end from a B16B (172bhp) and wants £150 (its recently been re-sleved and new rings)... it must be noted that its the head that adds the extra 22bhp to the import model
but yea, the D's are ok... but you cant beat the vtec on the B imo, it sounds beautiful. it doesnt have the torque of the D but power is better and you really really dont need buckets of torque when you're pulling less than 500kg of mini anyway
also, the B's can happily take around 250 horse through the standard bottom end. I have one friend with a crx running 199 horse (he's gutted) and another previously running high 230s, which incidently is the bottom end for sale
why oh why has no one put a frankenstein in a mini?!?!
#15
Posted 21 August 2008 - 05:02 PM
Torque vs. power arguement is one that will rumble on for eternity. I tend to disagree with both sides and say that drivability is more important, or suitability for each application, and that neither power nor torque can be compared without looking at the full package, including power and torque graphs. I'm hoping thats an answer no one can argue with!
As for home made subframes, if you can measure and weld then you have the basic skills needed. You'll also need time and lots of patience. I think its telling that so few people decide to build their own, opting to pay an extra £1000+ for a proven solution.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users