Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Nissan Micra Engine Transplant


  • Please log in to reply
701 replies to this topic

#301 iank

iank

    Learner Driver

  • Noobies
  • PipPip
  • 12 posts

Posted 06 February 2010 - 04:11 PM

hmm i see, just out of interest why is the return line needed?


You need a return as the injectors need a very high and constant fuel pressure, this is easiest to arrange as in the following diagram.

Carbs use low pressure and the pump is low pressure and just fills up the carb reservoir until it's blocked off by the float.

thanks for the advice! what would you reccommend then?


MPI fuel tank and pump come fitted with a return port if you want to use your boot as before, so that's the easy option. Could get a shiny aluminium tank fabricated if you want to, as most of the racers use, but you'll lose your boot as storage.

#302 paul6266

paul6266

    Speeding Along Now

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 482 posts
  • Local Club: Retro Classics

Posted 06 February 2010 - 04:42 PM

i couldnt help but notice that you only get 55bhp from a 1000cc micra engine plus cost of bits you need is it not cheaper to buy a vtec kit? although this is differant

#303 Artstu

Artstu

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 829 posts
  • Location: Derbyshire

Posted 07 February 2010 - 10:25 AM

i couldnt help but notice that you only get 55bhp from a 1000cc micra engine plus cost of bits you need is it not cheaper to buy a vtec kit? although this is differant


Not everyone wants power, plus I have a feeling 55hp from the 5-speed Micra will feel a darn sight nicer than say 65hp from an A-series. I myself would go for the 1.3 which should give a nice solid 85hp with decent induction and extraction.

And both these engines would still be 998cc and 1275cc on the log book.

#304 iank

iank

    Learner Driver

  • Noobies
  • PipPip
  • 12 posts

Posted 07 February 2010 - 10:42 AM

i couldnt help but notice that you only get 55bhp from a 1000cc micra engine plus cost of bits you need is it not cheaper to buy a vtec kit? although this is differant


55bhp is for the 1.0 Micra as standard and is badly strangled by the induction/exhaust. But use the 1.3, put a decent exhaust system on rather than the pea shooter and improve the breathing and it's comparable with the Suzuki 1.3 for bhp (i.e. around 100bhp).
See here for more details on a cheap recipe
http://www.micra.com...1500powerup.php

Find a turbo Micra engine and it will fly.

Micras are pretty successful rally cars in their class so there are lots of cheap bits available to make them go fast.

Maybe I'm missunderstanding, but I'm not sure how a vtec could ever be cheaper than the nissan due to the body mods that always seem to be required. Buying a pre-made subframe rather than making your own also costs a silly amount of money (for some reason they are sold at a twice the price of a complete lotus 7 style kit car chassis).

But IMO the micra conversion has some advantages over the alternatives:
Easy to source for little cash
Easier to DIY than the other swaps
Micra engine is a little lighter than the A series (all aluminium) so suits the car better IMO than the big heavy high power conversions.
Cheapest way to get a 100bhp engine and 5 speed gearbox in a mini, certainly a lot cheaper than getting an A series reliable at that kind of power.

But each to their own, they will never have the power of a VTEC or a 2.0 Redtop, so do whatever makes you happy :thumbsup:

#305 drummerian

drummerian

    Camshaft & Stage Two Head

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,674 posts

Posted 07 February 2010 - 02:09 PM

ok, sounds like the mpi tank is the way to go then, i take it there isn't an electric fuel pump or anything that could be used with the std carb'd tank?

i am going to the scrap yard tommorow, will be looking for smaller gearboxes than the 1.3 one i have. Any suggestions for what to look for (want to obviously make sure that i get the right gearbox), what sort of measurements am i looking for? thanks!

#306 jimbob69

jimbob69

    Passed Test

  • Noobies
  • PipPip
  • 30 posts

Posted 07 February 2010 - 08:35 PM

From what i have done so far i dont see the larger box as being a problem. Yes the frame needs a fair bit more chopping and you may have to be a bit more creative with some box section or plate but nose to tail it clears the front panel, bulkhead and the rack so therefore justifies its better ratios and strength. Plus its pretty much what you get in the uk. Im very confident it will be ok HOWEVER i must say untill mines in, plumbed and driving dont hold me to that!

#307 drummerian

drummerian

    Camshaft & Stage Two Head

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,674 posts

Posted 07 February 2010 - 10:30 PM

From what i have done so far i dont see the larger box as being a problem. Yes the frame needs a fair bit more chopping and you may have to be a bit more creative with some box section or plate but nose to tail it clears the front panel, bulkhead and the rack so therefore justifies its better ratios and strength. Plus its pretty much what you get in the uk. Im very confident it will be ok HOWEVER i must say untill mines in, plumbed and driving dont hold me to that!


thanks mate! i think i am only sceptical because after seeing flying bananas conversion in the flesh i've seen how much he has had to cut back! this however, may be due to the lateness of his engine (i believe it is from an 03 or somthing)...shall have a look in the scrappy tommorow for the smaller box, but if it can be avoided great! when do you think yours is going into the car?

any chance you can tell me where you acquires your box section? any updated pictures?

thanks

#308 jimbob69

jimbob69

    Passed Test

  • Noobies
  • PipPip
  • 30 posts

Posted 07 February 2010 - 10:51 PM

I thought you only had to cut for the inlet manifold? The boxes are the same right? mines a 94 vintage. Im poss gonna cast a custom manifold as i have access to a foundry at work or either fab one or go ott and billet machine one for car porn effect! I wont be fitting mine for a while as i need the mini in one piece untill my mk1 golf 20v turbo is finished, one at a time and all that......

#309 drummerian

drummerian

    Camshaft & Stage Two Head

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,674 posts

Posted 07 February 2010 - 10:56 PM

I thought you only had to cut for the inlet manifold? The boxes are the same right? mines a 94 vintage. Im poss gonna cast a custom manifold as i have access to a foundry at work or either fab one or go ott and billet machine one for car porn effect! I wont be fitting mine for a while as i need the mini in one piece untill my mk1 golf 20v turbo is finished, one at a time and all that......


ok thanks! flying banana has had to cut ALOT of the subframe apart, and the engine does come very very close to the steering rack!

am still looking into the option of the smaller box...does anyone have ideas on measurements?!

#310 jimbob69

jimbob69

    Passed Test

  • Noobies
  • PipPip
  • 30 posts

Posted 07 February 2010 - 11:10 PM

Mine is about 20mm clear of the rack and with the rock solid landrover mounts and a light engine should be fine, its about 10mm clear of the front of the subframe so its close but im not worried to be honest. Thats why it took me so long to do really, spent ages 'choppin a little and try again' before i decided to hack and use box section! Im not saying you cant follow bigchiefs approach, in fact i would like to see him do one with the larger box as im pretty sure he would work his magic and make it look so easy!

#311 drummerian

drummerian

    Camshaft & Stage Two Head

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,674 posts

Posted 08 February 2010 - 12:05 AM

Mine is about 20mm clear of the rack and with the rock solid landrover mounts and a light engine should be fine, its about 10mm clear of the front of the subframe so its close but im not worried to be honest. Thats why it took me so long to do really, spent ages 'choppin a little and try again' before i decided to hack and use box section! Im not saying you cant follow bigchiefs approach, in fact i would like to see him do one with the larger box as im pretty sure he would work his magic and make it look so easy!

haha cheers for the advice mate, whats your plan regarding fueling?

do you have a flip front? or are you attempting this into a std mini?!

#312 jimbob69

jimbob69

    Passed Test

  • Noobies
  • PipPip
  • 30 posts

Posted 08 February 2010 - 12:42 PM

Standard front and i dont want to cut anything. Mpi tank and pump seems the easiest way IMO

#313 Ethel

Ethel

    ..is NOT a girl!

  • TMF Team
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,673 posts
  • Local Club: none

Posted 08 February 2010 - 02:13 PM

There are roller vane pumps you can mount remotely - see the Metro Turbo. The return can just be Tee'd into the pipe between the tank & pump. I'd still go for an injection Mini tank if you can.

#314 drummerian

drummerian

    Camshaft & Stage Two Head

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,674 posts

Posted 08 February 2010 - 02:27 PM

There are roller vane pumps you can mount remotely - see the Metro Turbo. The return can just be Tee'd into the pipe between the tank & pump. I'd still go for an injection Mini tank if you can.

thanks for the advice, would this mean just the injetion tank and another line being run on the car? or is it more complex that this?

#315 Ethel

Ethel

    ..is NOT a girl!

  • TMF Team
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,673 posts
  • Local Club: none

Posted 08 February 2010 - 02:43 PM

You'll need a return line either way. The (Metro Turbo) pump I'm using has a 10mm input, so there's some juggling of adapters and hose sizes needed.

Posted Image Have look for a parts catalogue online (Bosch) to compare the specs of the Micra pump with any likely alternatives.




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users