Anybody fancy organising a "let's be a pain in the @rse blocking the entrances to the BMW dealerships with real Minis day"?
Yay..
*mental note to bring correct car*
Posted 09 February 2007 - 04:40 PM
Anybody fancy organising a "let's be a pain in the @rse blocking the entrances to the BMW dealerships with real Minis day"?
Posted 09 February 2007 - 04:42 PM
Posted 09 February 2007 - 04:58 PM
And me...it's called bullying and it is evil.....no wonder I have such a loathing for lawyers...............(if you are a lawyer reading this, then yes, I Do mean you, there is absolutely no excuse for treating people this way!)YesANY company would of done the same do you equally hate them?
Posted 09 February 2007 - 06:40 PM
I hope that Williams F1 blow them into the weeds this year.
Posted 09 February 2007 - 06:49 PM
Posted 09 February 2007 - 07:51 PM
im sorry for the loss of the people involved.
but im afraid its standard practice for any company to protect their product. sure in this case there wasnt much threat to them but like mentioned above if theyre seen to turn a blind eye with one person then theyre opening the flood gates for others.
people seem to be jumping on the "Hate BMW bandwaggon" a bit (not talking about the people who lost out to BMW here), ANY company would of done the same do you equally hate them?
Edited by taffy1967, 09 February 2007 - 07:58 PM.
Posted 09 February 2007 - 07:52 PM
Legally speaking though if BMW don't contest the trademark or copyright then they loose the right to hold it as a trademark or copyright, meaning if they hadn;t contested the use of the shape by 'mylittlecar' then anyone could have built mini shaped stuff and they couldn't have done anything about it!
Just so you know how the law works there.
D
Posted 09 February 2007 - 07:59 PM
Posted 09 February 2007 - 08:08 PM
Posted 09 February 2007 - 08:09 PM
Surely you can go to like a Crown Court or something, especially since seeing the above letter about the "we no longer have jurisdiction"....
Put 2+2 together and with a decent set of brains you could get out of it?
If not and I'm being stupid, really sorry, I'm just tryign to look on the bright side....
Posted 09 February 2007 - 08:12 PM
Posted 09 February 2007 - 08:16 PM
Taffy
Is that letter on proper headed paper?
I'm well confused now !!!
Edited by taffy1967, 09 February 2007 - 08:23 PM.
Posted 09 February 2007 - 08:19 PM
Posted 09 February 2007 - 08:19 PM
Posted 09 February 2007 - 08:28 PM
Darryl's letter is great & proves the point that B*W don't want anything to do with the smelly, rusty, unreliable little cars themselves - but the reply has no legal meaning at all.
B*W are completely legally correct.
They own the Rover trademarks too but it doesn't look like MG
Edited by taffy1967, 09 February 2007 - 08:31 PM.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users