Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Cam Options


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 miniGTS

miniGTS

    Mini Mad

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 230 posts
  • Location: Cape Town

Posted 20 February 2025 - 10:07 AM

I've decided to get my 1275 GTS engine rebuilt but undecided on whether to keep the standard GTS cam (which I think is the same spec as the 1275 CooperS cam - anyone else have info on this?)

 

or whether I should get something like the EVO1 cam that seems to get good reviews. I'm looking for something that will have good torque from low down and pull nicely thoughout the rev range rather than something that needs high revs before it come to life.

 

Keen to get feedback from those who have experience with these two cams. Is it worthwhile getting the EVO1 or is there not much difference compared to the standard GTS cam (assuming it is indeed the same spec as the CooperS cam).

 

 



#2 DeadSquare

DeadSquare

    Up Into Fourth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,070 posts
  • Location: Herefordshire
  • Local Club: Unipower GT Owners Club

Posted 20 February 2025 - 10:59 AM

You haven't put your engine's mileage, but it sounds as though parts of it are worn out, so if you are going to the expense of a rebuild, a new cam would be a relatively small portion of the budget, and the Evo is more modestly priced than many.



#3 miniGTS

miniGTS

    Mini Mad

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 230 posts
  • Location: Cape Town

Posted 20 February 2025 - 11:23 AM

You haven't put your engine's mileage, but it sounds as though parts of it are worn out, so if you are going to the expense of a rebuild, a new cam would be a relatively small portion of the budget, and the Evo is more modestly priced than many.


Mileage is unknown. It does still have standard pistons and will likely need a rebore to 20thou.

Noted about a new cam in a new build and yes, they're not unreasonably priced here in SA

#4 alpder

alpder

    Mini Mad

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 295 posts
  • Location: Pembrokeshire
  • Local Club: MCR

Posted 20 February 2025 - 02:47 PM

I have a Kent MD246 - chosen because it claims to give high torque low down. The car does pull like a train and tows without fuss on a 3.1FD, but I've nothing to compare it against, being my first Mini. Quite possibly a standard cam, or a MG Metro cam, would've driven much the same. Have a (bad) photocopy of the rolling road outputs, if you're interested. Though, of course, every engine differs in so many other ways.

 

The 246 is damn expensive and I'd love to know what are the equivalent cams out there from other makers, so watching this thread with interest.



#5 Cooperman

Cooperman

    Uncle Cooperman, Voted Mr TMF 2011

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,208 posts
  • Location: Cambs.
  • Local Club: MCR, HAMOC, Chelmsford M.C.

Posted 20 February 2025 - 10:21 PM

The Evo001 cam is a great road cam. I am just rebuilding a 1972 Midget engine for a friend and I have just fitted the Evo001.

With around 10.2:1 CR, a mildly flowed head and an Aldon 'Yellow' distributor I expect around 80 bhp. It will have 35.6 mm inlet valves and a standard Midget exhaust system.

A good alternative is the MG Metro cam which is very similar to the Kent 266. I have had good results with those cams as well. My 1990 Cooper road-rally car has an MG Metro cam and it is a delight to drive with strong torque from around 3200 rpm and peak power at 5700 rpm.

Of course, the key to better performance is the gas-flowing of the head and the fitting of the 36.5 mm inlet valves. It's not much good having a better cam if the head is still standard.



#6 Shooter63

Shooter63

    One Carb Or Two?

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 997 posts
  • Location: Essex

Posted Yesterday, 07:04 AM

I doubt you will get a specific answer to this question as I doubt anybody on here has done a back to back test, ie same engine and cam changes you specified. The safe answer is use a SW5 it does exactly what it says on the box and has dyno sheets to prove it.

Shooter

#7 minidave54

minidave54

    Mini Mad

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 184 posts
  • Location: Moray
  • Local Club: IMOG

Posted Yesterday, 01:31 PM

I rebuilt and upgraded a 1275 about 18 months ago after getting it re bored 20 thou. My cam of choice was the Evo 001 as I'd also heard good things about it. Here is the spec of my engine and the power and torque figures after a rolling road set up. The compression ratio is about 10.1:1

 

A mildly tuned Mini Spares head with inlet valves 35.7mm and exhaust 29.3mm.

Evo 001 cam and the matching Mini Spares recommended dizzy C-27H7701

A HIF44 carb fitted with a BDL needle

A maniflow twin box exhaust sytem

 

On the dyno this had 78 bhp @5700 rpm and a torque figure of 88 lb ft @ 3400 rpm.

 

I hope this helps 



#8 miniGTS

miniGTS

    Mini Mad

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 230 posts
  • Location: Cape Town

Posted Yesterday, 03:25 PM

Thanks for the feedback. The engine builder suggested, when I bring the engine to him, we should have a chat about what I want from the engine and how the car will be used and he will recommend something and we can then take it from there. He's been working on minis for 47 years and used to race and build race minis many years ago and seems to like the idea of building fast minis but will build whatever I want.



#9 surfbluejdm

surfbluejdm

    Learner Driver

  • Noobies
  • PipPip
  • 14 posts
  • Location: Las Vegas

Posted Yesterday, 04:57 PM

I'm also in the process of choosing a new cam due to some wear on mine.

 

I've talked to 3 USA-based Mini specialists and they all individually recommended the SW5 kit for average road use.






2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users