I'm not even sure if they're a legal requirement now! (I looked it up, only from Sep 2009)
Base models still used the mk2/3 light clusters in 1980.
Spider wrote "I am just shaking my head at that !
I'm ensuring my reverse switch is restored because in practice I would find it a boon, and I prefer an automatic reverse light switch. At the moment I have rigged up an illuminated toggle switch to manualy switch on the R lamp in the cluster which was factory fitted at time of manufacture. I think they are a GOOD idea. Almost indispensible, not absolutely , as in the case of brakes!
See, I can imagine the Parliament in those days discussing the reverse lamp, at the time when it wasn't mandatory. Here's my imagination at work: A car following behind should keep its distance - so why would a reverse lamp be necessary as a signal? Only for bad drivers, and such habits should not be encouraged, but ironed out at driving test time, and beyond by policing on the streets or a smack from a fatherly man. The first doesn't happen, the second is prohibited. Only deadly bad habits of the inconsiderate flourish nowadays . Bad habits for licence holders, perhaps are always developed through lazy inconsideration - a stupidity. When reverse parking the indicator should be on, which is signal enough.
A reverse lamp may provide some illumination however which is a nice option. But why mandate that? Its like mandating a sound system. More though, nowadays people are more (very) often inconsiderate and foolishly in a silly rush In busy towns. In fact indicating is too much bother for thos epeople, and if they do indicate, they very often manouvre and indicate at the same time!
I ride a fast m/c intowns, and I find this state of affairs is very often very dangerous to us, and to novices in partiucular; at least once every short trip, even ten times in a mile. I despise those people who do that.
And so, given that following their driving test pass, people fully become foolish drivers in the goodness of time, and not necessarly better drivers, a reverse lamp is so very useful when pullling up to reverse park, because the fools will stupidly (not accidentally) pull up right behind you. They do even with my reverse lights on (less so), but then might rereverse if they are still able (often only after you wave your arm at them to do so because stupidity lingers a long time).
What we need is police on the street sto tell people off for not indicating, with a warning and record the incident. They need to be re-taught and fined for putting others in great danger. I am convinced it accounts for many accidents. I feel sorry for youngsters.
Is this here thought experiment not silly? Well I ride a motorcycle and they dont have reverse lights, not even in Australia I would bet, but we also need to reverse park often in towns. You guessed, the main problem is people pulling up right behind you, even when stopped and indicating.
Perhaps people may want to switch off their lights and reverse without a lamp for some strange reason. I can only think of Spies in a silent Rols Royce benefiting from that. 
Anyway cars install reverse lamps as a matter of safety and convenience, and I think parliament usually leaves it to motor manufacturing own policy where possible because it is through motorists and manufacturers that most innovations arise and become in demand. In other words, parliament recognises that it is the intelligence of people that see to safety policies, just as they should see to safety in driving habits when actually driving.
John
Edited by chuee, 14 September 2023 - 03:41 PM.