Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Fitting Rad - Impossible


Best Answer mab01uk , 06 March 2023 - 08:13 AM

I would just remove the square metal cowl from the inner wing. It was deleted from the later Mk3/Mk4 onwards as it make no difference to engine temperature and makes fitting/working on the radiator, etc a whole lot easier. Only reason for keeping it is if originalty is a concern which as you have replaced the original 850 engine with a 1275.....does not seem to be an issue. Also if that was a problem the inner wing cowl is easily refitted during any future restoration to orginal spec.

 

I wonder why it took BMC/BL so many years to do it?...a cost reduction and it must have made things easier on the production line. Such things are often from a suggestion put forward by someone on the production line but in this case I suppose it also had to be confirmed that removal of the shroud made little or no difference to engine temperatures.

Go to the full post


  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

#1 alpder

alpder

    Mini Mad

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 286 posts
  • Location: Pembrokeshire
  • Local Club: MCR

Posted 05 March 2023 - 09:45 PM

More grief from this abandoned project I've picked up :-)

 

Attached File  B.Gap.jpg   52.08K   0 downloads

is in contention with

Attached File  B.Rad.jpg   35.51K   0 downloads

 

This is a 1968 998cc Mk2. It came with a mish-mash of bits clearly from several marks. In particular it has the Mk1/2/3 square rad-cowl welded to the inner wing, but it also has the later one-piece cowling bolted to the rad itself. To add to the mix, I've binned the random 850cc which came with the car and dropped in an A+ onto the original gearbox.

 

As the pics show above, there's no way the rad is going to drop into the gap between the engine and the square cowl welded to the wing.

 

What's my best solution:

 1) Remove the square cowl on the wing and bin it? Is that what they did on the Mk4? Or did they fit something else in its place?

 2) Fork out for a split cowl to see if it will fit? (I'm doubtful - the 1275's fan seems to be even closer to the wing that the one on the SBU was.)

 

 



#2 KTS

KTS

    Up Into Fourth

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,392 posts
  • Location: Herts

Posted 05 March 2023 - 09:49 PM

Remove the fan cowl from the radiator and fit that to the engine, then drop the radiator in and fit to the cowl

#3 alpder

alpder

    Mini Mad

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 286 posts
  • Location: Pembrokeshire
  • Local Club: MCR

Posted 05 March 2023 - 10:05 PM

Remove the fan cowl from the radiator and fit that to the engine, then drop the radiator in and fit to the cowl

Hmmm.... I tried that. But the rad bottom pipe seems to prevent it going into the space without getting beaten-up by the fan. Certainly there'd be no way of doing it with the bottom hose attached to the pipe.



#4 nicklouse

nicklouse

    Moved Into The Garage

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,377 posts
  • Location: Not Yorkshire
  • Local Club: Anonyme Miniholiker

Posted 05 March 2023 - 10:08 PM

Bottom hose fitted to the rad. Cowl over the fan. Rad in. Connect hose to water pump but not tight. Rad to cowl. Cowl to bottom mount loose. Check and tighten everything.



#5 alpder

alpder

    Mini Mad

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 286 posts
  • Location: Pembrokeshire
  • Local Club: MCR

Posted 05 March 2023 - 10:54 PM



Bottom hose fitted to the rad. Cowl over the fan. Rad in. Connect hose to water pump but not tight. Rad to cowl. Cowl to bottom mount loose. Check and tighten everything.


Tried that too. The oil/air separator holds the cowl forwards. So you can get the rad about half-way in. Then the bottom pipe jams between cowl and sub-frame tower, while the outside of the rad jams against the square cowl on the wing. If the square cowl on the wing wasn't there, it would fit fine.

Attached File  C.Rad.Back.jpg   36.79K   1 downloads

Attached File  C.Rad.Front.jpg   72.5K   0 downloads



#6 timmy850

timmy850

    Up Into Fourth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,209 posts
  • Location: NSW, Australia
  • Local Club: MITG

Posted 06 March 2023 - 01:49 AM

Remove the engine steadies
Put a jack under the LH side of the engine and remove the LH engine mount. Undo the RH engine mount but leave the bolts in and nuts on loosely
Jack up the LH side of the engine to bring the engine up as high as you can.
Then install the rad onto engine
Then put engine mount back in

#7 Spider

Spider

    Moved Into The Garage

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,639 posts
  • Location: NSW
  • Local Club: South Australian Moke Club

Posted 06 March 2023 - 06:16 AM

Here, try this but in reverse direction (post #11);-

 

https://www.theminif...nge-a-radiator/

 

While that guide is for a 2 piece cowling, you'd do as Nick suggested by fitting the Cowl over the Fan first, then follow the rest of that guide.



#8 imack

imack

    Up Into Fourth

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,016 posts
  • Location: Orpington, Kent

Posted 06 March 2023 - 06:37 AM

Have you got the n/s engine mount fitted?
If so, disconnect the engine mount and jack the radiator end of the engine up before trying to install the radiator components.

#9 mab01uk

mab01uk

    Moved Into The Garage

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,265 posts
  • Local Club: Mini Cooper Register

Posted 06 March 2023 - 08:13 AM   Best Answer

I would just remove the square metal cowl from the inner wing. It was deleted from the later Mk3/Mk4 onwards as it make no difference to engine temperature and makes fitting/working on the radiator, etc a whole lot easier. Only reason for keeping it is if originalty is a concern which as you have replaced the original 850 engine with a 1275.....does not seem to be an issue. Also if that was a problem the inner wing cowl is easily refitted during any future restoration to orginal spec.

 

I wonder why it took BMC/BL so many years to do it?...a cost reduction and it must have made things easier on the production line. Such things are often from a suggestion put forward by someone on the production line but in this case I suppose it also had to be confirmed that removal of the shroud made little or no difference to engine temperatures.


Edited by mab01uk, 06 March 2023 - 08:20 AM.


#10 mab01uk

mab01uk

    Moved Into The Garage

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,265 posts
  • Local Club: Mini Cooper Register

Posted 06 March 2023 - 08:19 AM

The later ADO16's also had their much larger radiator shroud deleted from the inner wing (see below)....anyone know the changeover year/dates...and was it the same for Minis and the BL 1100/1300 range?

2fiKeell.jpg

NNjyB7N.jpg

 



#11 Lplus

Lplus

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 822 posts
  • Location: Hampshire

Posted 06 March 2023 - 08:48 AM

I would just remove the square metal cowl from the inner wing. It was deleted from the later Mk3/Mk4 onwards as it make no difference to engine temperature and makes fitting/working on the radiator, etc a whole lot easier. Only reason for keeping it is if originalty is a concern which as you have replaced the original 850 engine with a 1275.....does not seem to be an issue. Also if that was a problem the inner wing cowl is easily refitted during any future restoration to orginal spec.

 

I wonder why it took BMC/BL so many years to do it?...a cost reduction and it must have made things easier on the production line. Such things are often from a suggestion put forward by someone on the production line but in this case I suppose it also had to be confirmed that removal of the shroud made little or no difference to engine temperatures.

I suspect the engine and rad were assembled on the subframe and the body dropped over it, so there would be no difficulty on the production line..  Even the rubber seal could be in place and just tucked up around the rad once the engine was in.

 

Any changes would have been made for either cost reduction by leaving out metal and welding, or the dealerships whinging about difficulty working on the cars, or both.



#12 alpder

alpder

    Mini Mad

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 286 posts
  • Location: Pembrokeshire
  • Local Club: MCR

Posted 06 March 2023 - 09:24 AM

Thanks everyone. Practicality beats originality on this particular build, so I'll hoik the engine out and drill-out the spots on the square cowl. Put it into storage ready for any future back-to-original resto. Along with the rear sliding windows, the single-speed wipers, the Mk2 grille, the front drum brakes/hubs, and the entire interior :-)



#13 IronmanG

IronmanG

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,213 posts
  • Location: Crawley
  • Local Club: Box hill. Lsmoc member

Posted 06 March 2023 - 05:47 PM

I would just remove the square metal cowl from the inner wing. It was deleted from the later Mk3/Mk4 onwards as it make no difference to engine temperature and makes fitting/working on the radiator, etc a whole lot easier. Only reason for keeping it is if originalty is a concern which as you have replaced the original 850 engine with a 1275.....does not seem to be an issue. Also if that was a problem the inner wing cowl is easily refitted during any future restoration to orginal spec.

I wonder why it took BMC/BL so many years to do it?...a cost reduction and it must have made things easier on the production line. Such things are often from a suggestion put forward by someone on the production line but in this case I suppose it also had to be confirmed that removal of the shroud made little or no difference to engine temperatures.


I was having some temp issues on mine and fitted the cowl with the rubber band. It worked wonders.

#14 mab01uk

mab01uk

    Moved Into The Garage

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,265 posts
  • Local Club: Mini Cooper Register

Posted 06 March 2023 - 07:55 PM

 

I would just remove the square metal cowl from the inner wing. It was deleted from the later Mk3/Mk4 onwards as it make no difference to engine temperature and makes fitting/working on the radiator, etc a whole lot easier. Only reason for keeping it is if originalty is a concern which as you have replaced the original 850 engine with a 1275.....does not seem to be an issue. Also if that was a problem the inner wing cowl is easily refitted during any future restoration to orginal spec.

I wonder why it took BMC/BL so many years to do it?...a cost reduction and it must have made things easier on the production line. Such things are often from a suggestion put forward by someone on the production line but in this case I suppose it also had to be confirmed that removal of the shroud made little or no difference to engine temperatures.


I was having some temp issues on mine and fitted the cowl with the rubber band. It worked wonders.

 

 

I suspect the later standard fit of the more efficient radiators which were originally only fitted to the Cooper S, also compensated for any small loss in cooling with the removal of the inner wing cowl and rubber band/seal on the production line. BL would have made tests before implementing the change in production on the Mini and ADO16 1100/1300 range. Also many enthusiast owners now fit the various larger aftermarket rads available from suppliers like Minispares.

https://www.minispar...AiAAEgIIYfD_BwE


Edited by mab01uk, 06 March 2023 - 07:55 PM.


#15 Cooperman

Cooperman

    Uncle Cooperman, Voted Mr TMF 2011

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,189 posts
  • Location: Cambs.
  • Local Club: MCR, HAMOC, Chelmsford M.C.

Posted 06 March 2023 - 10:53 PM

If you want to keep the cowl, you need to use the 2-piece shroud.
Fit the bottom hose and the lower part of the shroud.
Remove the fan.
Position the rad onto the lower mount.
Put a rectangular piece of cardboard against the rad to protect the rad and your hand.
Position the fan and bolt it in place.
Fit the bottom hose onto the pump.
Fit the top part of the shroud, the steady bracket and tighten the fan belt.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users