Jump to content


Photo

Has The Electric Car Bubble Burst?


  • Please log in to reply
323 replies to this topic

#316 Shooter63

Shooter63

    One Carb Or Two?

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 980 posts
  • Location: Essex

Posted 11 January 2025 - 09:38 PM

[quote name="Blumeanie" post="3779268" timestamp="1736619289"]I'm late to this discussion - AND it also took me a while to catch up...

A few thoughts. - And I'll also follow-up with some interesting images that I've run into since the EV debate started. 
Not much of a debate in my mind. EV is it all the way. For 90%+ of the population, today's EVs will meet the need just fine.
 
But Oh - Yes. there is fear & panic about all things new which require change (and a basic understanding of maths!)
 
I thought the difficulty was on this side of the pond with the heavy lobby (cultural & political) from the oil producers. I see this seems to be more widespread than I thought...
 
[quote name="Bobbins" post="3750516" timestamp="1692513693"]
Oh how the misinformation goes round and round!

I’ve now done 80,000 miles in my daily EV so can comment from that personal experience rather than the Facebook-informed experience.

The vast majority of EV owners charge at home or their place of work, the “charge rate” is approximately 4 miles per kw per hour of charge, so a 3kw charger at home will give 12 miles of charge per hour, charge overnight and it’ll be full in the morning (80% usually).
I’ve never charged at more than 2kw at home because I don’t have a dedicated charger, I use a 13A plug we have on the front of the house. When I got the car I decided to see how I got on and I’d have a charger installed at home if I needed one which hasn’t yet happened.

At work I can charge with 12kw but in reality if it was a typical 7kw “home” charge level I wouldn’t have an issue. If occasionally I only get to say 60% charge because I’ve used it more or time was limited it simply gets topped up the next day. In fact more recently I’ve only been charging it to 70%.

The only time I use a public or supercharger is when I travel further afield, and then it tends to be chargers on the motorway network and typically I’ll stop for maybe half an hour. These days my bladder really appreciates that topping up takes a little longer and the reality is that by the time you’ve found a loo and got back to the car, it’s certainly not the 5 minutes you thought it’d be. I’ve had to queue a few times at public chargers but never for more than 5-10 minutes, the maths quoted already in this thread assumes there’s only one charger and a queue meaning you’ll be there for hours, if that’s what you want to believe, ho hum. None of us have ever had to queue for fuel at a m-way services have we?

The reality is I spend less time “involved” with charging than I did “fuelling” my previous car with diesel. I park up, plug it in and walk away. It might appear odd to some people but I’m generally not in the habit of standing next to the car holding the charging nozzle while it charges, why would I want to do that.

Sadly people are buying EVs thinking they can charge them at Tesco while they do their shopping that will fill them up for the week, then they moan when it doesn’t work out. It’s not the same technology as ICEs and quick fill-ups can’t happen. You charge every day and just keep topping up, however few miles you do in the day.

It’s not complicated even though there’s an awful lot of people without first hand knowledge willing to tell you that it is.
[/quote]
 
There may be particular aspects to EV ownership in the UK - But I can tell you that even in desolate Northern Mexico they work brilliantly... And our needs far exceed those of a city car as we travel to the USA often all the way to the San Francisco Bay - and this is not a short trip.
 
Today - talking about hydrogen passenger vehicles is silly. It just does not make any sense. (I'll dig-up some graphics on this...)[/size]


Hybrids are a non-starter in my book. [/size]Hybrids certainly had their place -BUT 10 or 12 years ago! I definitely would not purchase a hybrid today. (Ok. maybe for SOME use cases...)[/size]
But it is not an elegant solution by modern means. Carrying 2 drivetrains is definitely NOT what I want. I want simplicity, not more complexity - and inefficiency. Maintenance hassles (and cost - essentially go away with an EV). No oil changes, etc. etc.

Is a Hybrid better than a pure ICE vehicle? Yes. but it is not the best solution today.[/size]


I can say with certainty that I've already purchased my last-ever internal combustion vehicle (I have a capable 4x4 ICE off roader - with a manual gearbox, thank you -  for camping and BAJA exploring purposes).
All battery EVs for us going forward. (I will only give up my manual gearbox for an EV).

I will get an EV 4x4 when a suitable replacement appears (3,4, or 5 years from now?) - at a reasonable price. there are some attractive prototypes out there![/size]


I don't see an issue when traveling long distances in our EV. 2, 3, 4 hundred miles. We've gone on 10 day road trips in it without an issue. Plenty of room for family and luggage, comfortable, QUIET, and FAST.

We plan charges at meal times. And the car charges too fast; I have to stop eating to move the car!

I'd expect batteries will be better / cleaner / lighter / cheaper [/size]
(looking at recent progress in those respects.).

B[/size]
y the time my 4x4 replacement is available as the technology will be even better than today. Batteries are is constantly improving and prices are coming down at an impressive rate... .  batteries and vehicles will only get better. [/size]
 
To be completely fair - Fuel and maintenance costs should be accounted for in the ICE vs EV equation comparison. I enjoy fueling my EV with only the sunshine that falls on my roof! 

When / how can you ever get free fuel for an EV (Yes - I had to pay for the solar panels so there was a cost... but this system also powers our home and will pay for itself in a handful of years.)[/size]

 
You get free fuel while at the shops, etc. I even worked out free charging on the road for YEARS when purchasing the car. So yes. FREE FUEL.I spend less time fueling the EV than any ICE vehicle ever before.

and hell yes... - I'll be keeping my mini!
 
 


So if you run out of power completely according to that CAUTION you have to stay in the car until someone plugs you into a low voltage supply so you can open the door to get out without shattering a window.
Having almost reached the age of 75 if I need a new car there is no way I will

 
[quote name="Shooter63" post="3762417" timestamp="1710679470"]
EV related, has anybody noticed that there car insurance has gone through the roof, my daily driver is a big engined turbocharged oil burner, last year the insurance was £495.00 this years renewal is £800.00!!!!! I've got a clean licence etc, no changes at all, after shopping around my present company is actually the cheapest which is unusual. I happen to know a guy in the insurance industry and asked him why has it gone up so much as I didn't believe the speil being punted out on the net. The true reason is that the insurance companies are writing off so many EV's that are involved in accidents in case there has been some sort of a battery pack damage leading to even more of the sodding things catching on fire. Happy days.

Shooter

 
Insurance is increasing across the board - and this is not due to EVs. All newer vehicles seem to suffer damage by looking at them hard. There are sensors and cameras mounted everywhere you are likely to bump into something (On newer ICE vehicles too  - and newer ICE vehicles are spying on you too!)
 
The newer structural safety requirements also increase repair costs as areas are designed to crumple on impact. 20 airbags to replace is a huge cost and this results in more write offs... Parts scarcity is also an issue with all new cars. Any new car will likely surprise you with the insurance costs these days!
 
Sorry mate you are 100% wrong, I got my info straight from the horses mouth, not some crappy Internet search site or the like but from a head of one of the major uk insurance companies who happens to be a member of a club I belong to, things might be different on your side of the pond but over here no.

Shooter

#317 Bobbins

Bobbins

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,465 posts
  • Location: Chester

Posted 12 January 2025 - 08:18 AM

Sorry mate you are 100% wrong, I got my info straight from the horses mouth, not some crappy Internet search site or the like but from a head of one of the major uk insurance companies who happens to be a member of a club I belong to, things might be different on your side of the pond but over here no.

Shooter

So nothing to do with the cost of repairs being astronomical and the ambulance chasers involved? Anyone in any organisation isn’t necessarily party to ALL the information applicable to the whole trade.

My daily had a front wing scuffed in a public car park late last year, nothing serious, the guy parking next to it scuffed the front corner, the wheel, and the rear section of the wing forward of the passenger door. The rear of the wing was pushed in by a few mm but can be pulled out. It’s an aluminium wing and doesn’t need replacing.
The damage is minimal and if it were a much older car and not an insurance claim, I suspect some owners would ignore it.

So what’s this going to cost? Including my insurance broker and insurance company, there are 8 separate companies involved, all supposedly trying to ‘provide me with the best service’ or ‘mitigate costs’, quite honestly it’s a farce.

None of these businesses work for free so each one’s fee will be wrapped up in the ultimate cost, a cost I might not ever know about, whether it be broker fees, legal fees, whether paid due to the actual claim or as part of the company to company arrangements, annual service fees, retainers etc.

I do know what the minimum cost will be though because I’ve had the quote from the body shop and it’s been agreed that they can do the work … £3,500 + vat. There’s even a new tyre included in the quote because there’s damage to the wheel, albeit it a minor scuff to the face of the spokes, but no way it needs a new tyre.

Quite honestly it’s a joke and to blame it on EVs being written off due to minor bumps is ‘head buried in sand’ status. The industry has created its own monster and sadly we have to pay the bill.

Edited by Bobbins, 12 January 2025 - 08:24 AM.


#318 PoolGuy

PoolGuy

    One Carb Or Two?

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 834 posts
  • Location: Bucks

Posted 12 January 2025 - 08:21 AM

It’s not unusual for certain people on this forum to post utter rubbish as facts, when asked for evidence they go strangely quiet. 



#319 Bobbins

Bobbins

    One Carb Or Two?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,465 posts
  • Location: Chester

Posted 12 January 2025 - 08:26 AM

It’s not unusual for certain people on this forum to post utter rubbish as facts, when asked for evidence they go strangely quiet.


You could say that on any thread though!

#320 Shooter63

Shooter63

    One Carb Or Two?

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 980 posts
  • Location: Essex

Posted 12 January 2025 - 10:16 AM

It’s not unusual for certain people on this forum to post utter rubbish as facts, when asked for evidence they go strangely quiet.


Name and shame, give them the chance to defend themselves.

Shooter

#321 PoolGuy

PoolGuy

    One Carb Or Two?

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 834 posts
  • Location: Bucks

Posted 12 January 2025 - 10:28 AM

 

It’s not unusual for certain people on this forum to post utter rubbish as facts, when asked for evidence they go strangely quiet.


Name and shame, give them the chance to defend themselves.

Shooter

 

They’d just go quiet and ignore the post. Happened just recently when someone claimed that cam followers had “the sides worn through”, despite a request for links, nothing was forthcoming. Certainly not the only time it’s happened. 



#322 Shooter63

Shooter63

    One Carb Or Two?

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 980 posts
  • Location: Essex

Posted 12 January 2025 - 11:19 AM

It’s not unusual for certain people on this forum to post utter rubbish as facts, when asked for evidence they go strangely quiet.


Name and shame, give them the chance to defend themselves.

Shooter
They’d just go quiet and ignore the post. Happened just recently when someone claimed that cam followers had “the sides worn through”, despite a request for links, nothing was forthcoming. Certainly not the only time it’s happened. 

That was posted on a classic mini FB page, probably one of the MK1 sites if you care to sift through, if I remember rightly it was lifters 6, 7, 8 , 8 being the worst.

Shooter

#323 PoolGuy

PoolGuy

    One Carb Or Two?

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 834 posts
  • Location: Bucks

Posted 12 January 2025 - 01:34 PM

I was hoping that you’d provide a link when I asked before, but I guess it wasn’t as dramatic as suggested.



#324 stuart bowes

stuart bowes

    Camshaft & Stage Two Head

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,952 posts
  • Location: Dagenham

Posted 16 January 2025 - 12:55 PM






2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users