Edited by mighty_mini, 29 January 2007 - 06:07 PM.
Fwd R1 mini
#91
Posted 29 January 2007 - 05:00 PM
#92
Posted 29 January 2007 - 05:22 PM
Cheers
David
#93
Posted 29 January 2007 - 05:24 PM
#94
Posted 29 January 2007 - 05:28 PM
#95
Posted 29 January 2007 - 05:31 PM
Cheers
David
#96
Posted 29 January 2007 - 05:41 PM
#97
Posted 29 January 2007 - 05:51 PM
Well thats certainly a more polite way of saying what you said earlier!Yes I agree, but why don't people keep them to themselves, calling other peoples conversions ******* doesn't help anyone
Cheers
David
#98
Posted 29 January 2007 - 05:53 PM
Edited by mighty_mini, 29 January 2007 - 06:08 PM.
#99
Posted 30 January 2007 - 08:14 PM
Edited by Oldskoolbaby, 30 January 2007 - 08:15 PM.
#100
Posted 31 January 2007 - 08:51 AM
Who's been swearing???! lol Missed that. If I seemed to offend Miff, I do apologise. I was honestly asking what he's power to weight ratio was and whether it handled any worse for having a 3 tonne lump up front. Only a few people have ever fit these ultra light R1 motors upfront in a Mini and I was just interested in how they compare to more common machinery. And I was genuinely asking him if he's got an R1 powered car or some sort off ultra special R1 with an LSD.
Brett, don't worry about it, some people think that other peoples project threads are a good place to brag about their own cars and cause arguments. This is supposed to be about your special motor!
Let's just get back on topic and find out exactly where yours is up to mate, have you got any further along with it and more importantly, so you have any fresh piccies????
#101
Posted 31 January 2007 - 12:05 PM
Both a re looking great though
Edited by TOMMO0302, 31 January 2007 - 12:06 PM.
#102
Posted 31 January 2007 - 01:11 PM
lol, this isn't actually OldSkoolBaby's project thread!
Both a re looking great though
Aaah!
Let's find out where the original is up to then!
#105
Posted 04 February 2007 - 12:05 AM
and my engine is in the front and and at 7500rpm is definately going to compare well if not better overall in an everyday situation than your out of puff r1 motor in a car reguardless of how many bhp you put through it, and i own two r1s a 04 and a 99 and your dragging a lot more wieght about and you have got to get it there at a lot more expense, and you have lost the back of the car great if your`e single.
Do you know what FWD stands for LOL????? Have you seen mine and Bosanovas cars?? Hardly everyday cars, wouldn't you agree? I wouldn't call 140 bhp as standard out of puff. Doesn't matter how much weight its pulling around either. 160bhp is 160bhp, whether its being produced by a balls out italian V12 or an ellastic band. It still means these cars will have around 270bhp/tonne. If your thinking in terms of torque, the R1 offers plenty enough for a Mini. Fair play if you've fit an XE in the front of a clubman but how much more heavy is it for it? Power to weight ratio? Handling/traction compared to a lighter Mini?
Not only that, but If you think were putting R1 engines in the front to be dawdled around town i.e everyday driving, I think your very much mistaken.
A bike engine powered car is a completly different perspective to a Vtec, XE, K seires or any other type of car powered Mini. Check out the Extreme Mini DVD for example. Im sure Ive seen a yellow 195+bhp Vtec get wooped by much smaller engined stuff on one of those films(Correct me if Im wrong).
As the the torque issue, I am a muppet I read it a bit too quickly and got my nm mixed up with my lb/ft..................
you may not be wrong, but i have rode bikes all my life, i own quite a few including two r1s and the point i was trying to make is it will cost you a lot more to drag a car about with a bike engine,unless you can do it for the price of the engine alone, r1 engine £500 - 1000, xe cxe £160- 250 then there is the rest, so you can always buy the ready made option point made, miff nm, lb/ft what`s that?
.....honestly
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users