I'm contemplating a BP255 camshaft from Piper. They offer a new one or a re-profiled one using your own camshaft for about 60% of the new cost. Is there any difference in quality between the 2 types?

Camshaft
#1
Posted 28 November 2019 - 08:58 PM
#2
Posted 28 November 2019 - 09:47 PM
Bear in mind a new cam comes with new followers
#3
Posted 29 November 2019 - 12:53 AM
You would be better going for a Mini Spares Evo001.
#4
Posted 29 November 2019 - 09:46 AM
It's going into a 1098 +0.100" with a modified 295 head, so looking for low torque. Already have an evo001 in the wife's 1330 so I know it's good but I was recommended the Piper as a better cam for the proposed engine. Was sticking with 1.3 rockers.
#5
Posted 29 November 2019 - 07:47 PM
contact AC Dodd. his cams are apparantly top notch and he has one similar ones to the bp255 i think
#6
Posted 29 November 2019 - 10:33 PM
A 255 is 264° duration.I'd fit a 266 profile, a 255 is under crammed imo,
They are in the same range as 266, EVO1, MG Metro, SW5 but perform better imho.
I fit billet, oil fed ones to every road engine I build from 850 to 1460. Fantastic profile.
Do not 'over compress' the engine.
Edited by OzOAP, 29 November 2019 - 10:35 PM.
#7
Posted 30 November 2019 - 10:33 AM
A 255 is 264° duration.I'd fit a 266 profile, a 255 is under crammed imo,
They are in the same range as 266, EVO1, MG Metro, SW5 but perform better imho.
I fit billet, oil fed ones to every road engine I build from 850 to 1460. Fantastic profile.
Do not 'over compress' the engine.
It will have +.100" flat tops and I would be looking for around the 10:1 CR. Would that be about right for a road car?
Edited by whistler, 30 November 2019 - 10:35 AM.
#8
Posted 30 November 2019 - 11:19 AM
OAP Conical valve springs are specifically designed for this range.
Edited by OzOAP, 30 November 2019 - 11:23 AM.
#9
Posted 30 November 2019 - 11:19 AM
I would aim more towards 9.5/9.75It will have +.100" flat tops and I would be looking for around the 10:1 CR. Would that be about right for a road car?
It can then cope a couple more degrees ignition.
Edited by OzOAP, 30 November 2019 - 11:19 AM.
#10
Posted 30 November 2019 - 11:46 AM
Also, do not over spring the head with these cams.
OAP Conical valve springs are specifically designed for this range.
Looking for 180 to 200lb doubles. I think the original 'S' had 200lb.
I'll keep CR under the 10 then.
#11
Posted 02 December 2019 - 07:49 AM
To keep valve on seat, 65/75lb is adequate. That is what a normal double spring does, but to do that it means it has 180/200 at full lift (0.330/0.400). That is more than is required and increases parasitic losses and wear.
A conical spring is progressive due to different size coils.
At 70lb seat pressure the OAP springs give 145lb pressure 'over the nose'(full lift), thus there is less wear on followers/cam/chain, more accurate lift and timing due to less pushrod flex, less friction/heat due to not having inner/outer springs rubbing against each other, smaller/lighter top caps, all this makes for a freer revving engine.
They do make a difference and have been banned by the idiots in the Mini 7 Club due to the advantage the springs give.
£100 with std modified topcaps, (exchange). Steel caps available @ £60 extra.

#12
Posted 02 December 2019 - 07:09 PM
Ac
Edited by ACDodd, 02 December 2019 - 07:10 PM.
#13
Posted 02 December 2019 - 07:17 PM
What Oz said, and lower compression and more timing is always better that too much compression and retarded Timing. That 255 would be installed with 9.65:1 if I built that.
Ac
Thanks for that. Would there be any advantage to using your RS cam in this engine?
#14
Posted 02 December 2019 - 10:40 PM
Send me your email and I shall send you my cam info.
Ac
#15
Posted 16 February 2020 - 01:50 PM
Curious what your final thought and decision as I have a bp255 in my modded stage 3 mini with hif44/ LCB etc etc - focus was on low end torque as rare I am over 6500k - runs great!!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users