
#1
Posted 11 December 2017 - 10:38 PM
#2
Posted 11 December 2017 - 10:54 PM
There are plenty of universal throttle cables on the web.
#3
Posted 11 December 2017 - 10:57 PM
Shooter
#4
Posted 15 December 2017 - 09:29 PM
If you think outside of A series ie Ford then all linkage kits work for twin side drafts, but for my money I would sell the 45's ( big for a A series anyway ) and go for fi with a programmable ecu . You could use bike throttle bodies for a cheaper set up which are very popular in the tuning world.
Shooter
I was thinking of using a Beetle kit as the base line but using a Ford kit (As they sit much closer) would be a much more sensible idea!
I would also like to go for throttle bodies however the extra 2k costs are really off putting. I'm tempted to run my car for a year and put it on after the inital costs?
The 7 port is a great conversion. If you're building a track warrior revving to 9,000 the 45's will be great. If you're going to run it on the road the 45's will be too big. You'll end up with next to no torque. You've got enough time to look round for some 40's and perhaps do a swap.
There are plenty of universal throttle cables on the web.
~Thanks for the advise. My plan is to use the mini for Hill Climbs in the long run which is why I thought the 45's. I only mentioned the road use as I'm part of a club and I sometimes show my face!
For more bottom end drive ability, perhaps Webers 40's would be better!
Thanks for the advise both!
The 7 port is a great conversion. If you're building a track warrior revving to 9,000 the 45's will be great. If you're going to run it on the road the 45's will be too big. You'll end up with next to no torque. You've got enough time to look round for some 40's and perhaps do a swap.
There are plenty of universal throttle cables on the web.
~Thanks for the advise. My plan is to use the mini for Hill Climbs in the long run which is why I thought the 45's. I only mentioned the road use as I'm part of a club and I sometimes show my face!
For more bottom end drive ability, perhaps Webers would be better!
Thanks for the advise!
#5
Posted 15 December 2017 - 09:38 PM
If you're going to use it for anything other that flat out track work the 45's will be too large. The 40's are a great compromise and give that unmistakable Weber bark. Personally I'd go for a programmable ECU with bike carbs and injection for the economy answer and throttle bodies and injectors for a more expensive option.
#6
Posted 16 December 2017 - 10:02 AM
Phil.
#7
Posted 19 December 2017 - 09:22 PM
Lovely, thanks all of you. My mind has been made up;
Install a single Weber 45 on a 6" Manifold (Yes I am aware I have to cut in to the bulk head) - I will do this to at least listen to the Weber for a year and enjoy it, who know might even be able to break the 100 hp at the flywheel!
Once I've got the money, time and knowledge together, I'll get a SC 7 port head along with the individual throttle bodies and wire up a nice ECU too. I'll also sell the Weber's to offset the cost of the new head - Still, its something to get the extra 2k costs back!
#8
Posted 19 December 2017 - 11:06 PM
If I were you I would save for the Injection set up for this head http://twinkam.co.uk.../Products/SC209
#9
Posted 19 December 2017 - 11:21 PM
It's much better value if you can buy the SC 7 port head and matched injection rather than this set up for the non SC head and a separate head from another supplier.If I were you I would save for the Injection set up for this head http://twinkam.co.uk.../Products/SC209
#10
Posted 20 December 2017 - 12:31 AM
Phil.
#11
Posted 20 December 2017 - 07:29 PM
It's much better value if you can buy the SC 7 port head and matched injection rather than this set up for the non SC head and a separate head from another supplier.If I were you I would save for the Injection set up for this head http://twinkam.co.uk.../Products/SC209
that is a matching head and inj set up
#12
Posted 20 December 2017 - 07:31 PM
The one you've listed is the injection set for a none SC 7 port head.that is a matching head and inj set up
It's much better value if you can buy the SC 7 port head and matched injection rather than this set up for the non SC head and a separate head from another supplier.If I were you I would save for the Injection set up for this head http://twinkam.co.uk.../Products/SC209
#13
Posted 21 December 2017 - 11:26 PM
The one you've listed is the injection set for a none SC 7 port head.
that is a matching head and inj set up
It's much better value if you can buy the SC 7 port head and matched injection rather than this set up for the non SC head and a separate head from another supplier.If I were you I would save for the Injection set up for this head http://twinkam.co.uk.../Products/SC209
ok My apologizes I just clicked the pic about the kit but they sell the 7PORT HEAD and INJ KIT
#14
Posted 22 December 2017 - 12:08 AM
Yes, it's a great piece of kit. I have it fitted on mine.ok My apologizes I just clicked the pic about the kit but they sell the 7PORT HEAD and INJ KIT
The one you've listed is the injection set for a none SC 7 port head.
that is a matching head and inj set up
It's much better value if you can buy the SC 7 port head and matched injection rather than this set up for the non SC head and a separate head from another supplier.If I were you I would save for the Injection set up for this head http://twinkam.co.uk.../Products/SC209
#15
Posted 22 December 2017 - 11:20 PM
Discount the idea of webers with the SC head. They don't make a manifold contrary to what they say on the website and if you make your own manifolds you loose the gains from the SC head over other 7 ports. They manage a straight port tract into the outer cylinders which is perfect for their direct to head throttle bodies, however if you then overlay the weber port pattern you have to run a steep angle into the ports or a very long manifold to smooth out the angle but end up with the webers outside the bodywork.
I have roughly CAD'd up the head and using a weber I found on grabcad made a 20mm manifold (the smallest I could manage) it still ended up with 80% of the weber outside the bonnet and then you will want ram pipes.
I am now investigating using Mikuni carbs which have a better port spacing (still not ideal) and they are shorter than the weber, but I still expect some ram pipes poking through the bonnet.
(I found out about the weber situation the hard way after spending on a second hand SC head and tried buying a weber manifold from them)
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: engine
Mini Technical Sections →
Problems, Questions and Technical →
‘93 Spi Downpipe ReplacementStarted by ShabbyMini , 03 Apr 2025 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
||
Mini Technical Sections →
Problems, Questions and Technical →
93 Italian Job Wont StartStarted by Mattnumber2 , 28 Mar 2025 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
||
Mini Technical Sections →
Problems, Questions and Technical →
NewbieStarted by adenton , 23 Mar 2025 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
||
Mini Technical Sections →
Problems, Questions and Technical →
Tips On Buy An Used Su Hs4 CarbStarted by hfolguera , 17 Mar 2025 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
||
Mini Technical Sections →
Problems, Questions and Technical →
Engine Has Been Sat 10 YearsStarted by JHN_mini , 15 Mar 2025 ![]() |
|
![]()
|
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users