Any ideas on what this number means - stamped on engine block where you'd expect to see a plate - MS961 IE 0711
engine has many signs of a 1275 Cooper S - tappet covers, tall, headbolts etc. Thanks
Posted 25 February 2014 - 01:04 PM
Any ideas on what this number means - stamped on engine block where you'd expect to see a plate - MS961 IE 0711
engine has many signs of a 1275 Cooper S - tappet covers, tall, headbolts etc. Thanks
Posted 25 February 2014 - 01:08 PM
Looks like a modified engine that has it's maker's marking on it.
Afraid I don't know who, or any other details.
Would MS stand for Minispares?
Edited by HarrysMini, 25 February 2014 - 01:18 PM.
Posted 25 February 2014 - 09:49 PM
well IF its an S then it would have no machined hole where the petrol pump would be but would have a rivited ally plate with either 970, 1071 or 1275 stamped on.......
Posted 26 February 2014 - 12:02 AM
Posted 26 February 2014 - 07:24 AM
or MiniSport or MiniSpeed or MiniSomethingelse etc etc
But the as originally stated, it's a reconditioners mark so ideally to get the spec of the engine you will need to find out who built it.
Drop a picture up of the whole engine and will be able to tell you if it's a cooper S block or not.
Posted 26 February 2014 - 07:28 AM
Posted 26 February 2014 - 07:46 AM
Posted 26 February 2014 - 09:39 AM
MS961 IE 0711
MS = Minispeed
961 = engine number
IE = Ian Elliott
07 = Month
11 = Year
MK1 S 1293cc engine and box
+0.020" overbore with Omega 6.5cc dished pistons
Balanced S rods
0.0035" bore clearance
Block surfaced 0.020"
Reground heat treated balanced MK3 S crank on 10/10 grind
Ultralite flywheel and backplate using orange diaphragm and bonded rally plate
Kent 286 cross drilled billet cam
Duplex timing
Centre main strap
Minispeed Concept 36 cylinder head
1.5:1 roller rockers
11:1 compression ratio
customers original gearbox was refitted to this and it was rolling roaded at 102BHP
Posted 26 February 2014 - 09:53 AM
Posted 26 February 2014 - 10:37 AM
Sounds like a nice build...
Posted 26 February 2014 - 12:29 PM
Interesting practice in the markings. Is this instead of the original stamping or as well as . ? It is great that a record has been kept of the build? not sure if info should be made available to anyone who asks? - did we get the owners permission? and if it instead of the original (9 FSaY as example ) i would want that preserved,, but i know sometimes the machinists don't do this ..
Posted 26 February 2014 - 12:50 PM
Interesting practice in the markings. Is this instead of the original stamping or as well as . ? It is great that a record has been kept of the build? not sure if info should be made available to anyone who asks? - did we get the owners permission? and if it instead of the original (9 FSaY as example ) i would want that preserved,, but i know sometimes the machinists don't do this ..
For the simple fact that the engine number describes the specification of the engine... if you change the engine's specification then you should also change the engine number or provide documentation which then supersedes the previous specification...
Most of the time engine builders will renumber an engine, and have documentation to support that engine number. This is now required by the DVLA when changing details on the car.
You may keep the original engine number, but then the publicly available information on engine specifications no longer apply which could be considered a reason for deception, misrepresentation or even fraud, especially when considering insurance.
Posted 26 February 2014 - 04:45 PM
Hi it is normal practice for us to use one of our engine numbers on a custom engine build as it makes it easy to identify the specification for future support etc and as part of the branding, and the engine tag is removed when the block is surfaced, but if the number was important to a client then we would replace it as was if required.
Posted 26 February 2014 - 09:59 PM
thanks for the replies guys, i was not familiar with the DVLA requirements, (whatever that stands for) , it is a very good way of checking what is inside, something that is always a bit of a worry. Guess works , i hadn't thought of the insurance angle - in regard to mods. Thanks to Scott for clearing that up.- thorough system - just want you would want in a engine build - Cheers and back to the original post - sorry for the hijack - it does indeed sound like a good build
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users