#1
Posted 24 February 2013 - 10:42 PM
I have recently started to think of things i could do to get that little extra and whether it would be worth it.
To fit some 1.5 high lift rockers is it necessary that i change the cam and/or head?
Would i gain anything if i just changed the rockers first? (if possible)
If i do have to change anything else, what cam's, heads and other parts would you recommend to make a fast road 998 :)
Cheers,
Iain.
#2
Posted 24 February 2013 - 10:43 PM
#3
Posted 24 February 2013 - 10:51 PM
The rockers... Would they have gains only on 1275's? Or would they be good for a 998 with say... 12g295 or 12g940 head, double valve springs etc...?
Iain.
Edited by IainNeon91, 24 February 2013 - 10:51 PM.
#4
Posted 24 February 2013 - 10:51 PM
And higher ratio rockers (most advise the 1.3s on small bores) can't hurt, but I would favour a cam change over them.
Edited by BritishRacingGreen, 24 February 2013 - 10:52 PM.
#5
Posted 24 February 2013 - 10:53 PM
Could be interesting to know.
Could i get my head skimmed (until funds are raised) ?? Will this provide some gains?
#6
Posted 24 February 2013 - 10:59 PM
Skimming the standard head will give some gains (though i doubt particularly noticeable). And the cost of getting the standard head ported to the standard of the 295 would be more than a 295. Just keep an eye out on ebay, but do check before you buy. 295's are old, so it's likely they will have cracks, or will have been previously skimmed. make sure if you buy one it will suit your needs.
#7
Posted 24 February 2013 - 11:06 PM
But sorry, a couple more questions
Will the block need to be pocketed to fit a 12g295
What about a 12g202 1098 head? Would this fit straight on with no problems?
#8
Posted 24 February 2013 - 11:09 PM
The 202 as fitted to the 1098s is very similar, but does not perform as well. It is an improvement over the standard head mind you.
#9
Posted 24 February 2013 - 11:17 PM
Working out the compression ratio:
Is my Rover Mini Neon 1991, 998cc a low or high compression engine?
Low: 9.6:1
High: 8.5:1
Edited by IainNeon91, 24 February 2013 - 11:19 PM.
#10
Posted 24 February 2013 - 11:22 PM
Although for some reason I think the newer cars were the high compression version (don't take that for certain though)
#11
Posted 24 February 2013 - 11:28 PM
#12
Posted 24 February 2013 - 11:33 PM
I will have a look at guess works
#13
Posted 25 February 2013 - 07:53 AM
#14
Posted 25 February 2013 - 02:14 PM
So it's 12g295 head skimmed to correct specification, kent 286 cam, double valve springs and keep the standard 1.3 rockers?
Edited by IainNeon91, 25 February 2013 - 02:14 PM.
#15
Posted 25 February 2013 - 02:15 PM
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: engine
Mini Technical Sections →
Problems, Questions and Technical →
Clutch Not DisengagingStarted by Sharks , 15 Dec 2024 engine |
|
|
||
Mini Technical Sections →
Problems, Questions and Technical →
Possible Transmission Problem?Started by aguiloco , 07 Dec 2024 engine |
|
|
||
Mini Technical Sections →
Problems, Questions and Technical →
Crud In Combustion Chamber.Started by Rubbershorts , 16 Nov 2024 engine |
|
|
||
Mini Technical Sections →
Problems, Questions and Technical →
Full Rebuild MethodologyStarted by PeteD , 16 Nov 2024 engine, electrical |
|
|
||
Mini Technical Sections →
Problems, Questions and Technical →
Low Compression Across The BoardStarted by Vinay-RS , 11 Nov 2024 engine |
|
|
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users