
Pro's And Cons To Lighten The Flywheel
#1
Posted 24 October 2012 - 07:04 AM
thanks in advance guys
#2
Posted 24 October 2012 - 07:12 AM
I used a Ultra light steel flywheel on a project of mine, idle was lumpy (I did also have a different cam though) , but the engine revved so freely afterwards. I thought it became much easier to drive, didn't have to be so heavy on the foot to accelerate.
#3
Posted 24 October 2012 - 07:21 AM
Using a lighter than standard flywheel reduces the rotational mass of the the crank assembly, this reduces the amount of torque which is used to turn the assembly, therefore making it available to the drivetrain. As above this generally means the pickup of the engine is quicker. On the downside, because you have reduced the rotational mass, then you have also reduced the inertia ( flywheel effect ) of the assembly, so it will also slow down quicker, this is great for a performance engine where it needs to accelerate and decelerate quickly, but not so good if you want to cruise along the motorway at a constant 60-70 mph.. in this case you will use more fuel and induce more wear on the engine because you will always need to be 'on the throttle' to maintain a speed.
#4
Posted 24 October 2012 - 07:37 AM
#5
Posted 24 October 2012 - 07:42 AM
... is great for a performance engine where it needs to accelerate and decelerate quickly, but not so good if you want to cruise along the motorway at a constant 60-70 mph..
I wonder if there is a flywheel where the weight(or balance, mass towards the center or edge) can be controlled electronically? Or maybe centrifugally. Or maybe have two or more flywheels you can switch from, as you would shifting gears.
#6
Posted 24 October 2012 - 07:52 AM
#7
Posted 24 October 2012 - 08:26 AM
Like a dual mass flywheel?
Not quite as those two masses can't be detached from one another, unless there is a different type to those used on diesels.
I think what he means is extra weight which spins freely on a bearing but can then be joined to the fixed flywheel somehow, possibly by a friction material like a second clutch?
#8
Posted 24 October 2012 - 08:54 AM
So I didn't.
#9
Posted 24 October 2012 - 08:56 AM
but not so good if you want to cruise along the motorway at a constant 60-70 mph.. in this case you will use more fuel and induce more wear on the engine because you will always need to be 'on the throttle' to maintain a speed.
That's an interesting theory..........
#10
Posted 24 October 2012 - 09:06 AM
Depening on full engine spec, you're gonna loose some torque under load with a light fly, and the engine wont like to run smoothly at idle and at constant revs like 2500rpm.
So evaluate accordigily.
#11
Posted 24 October 2012 - 09:19 AM
you will lose torque
lightened flywheels are for high performance engines with big cams
my engine is just balanced has mg metro cam stage 3 head maniflow stage 2
goes great with heaps torque
#12
Posted 24 October 2012 - 09:26 AM
#13
Posted 24 October 2012 - 11:44 AM
#14
Posted 24 October 2012 - 11:54 AM
#15
Posted 24 October 2012 - 11:56 AM
Be careful lightening standard flywheels if you don't really know what you are doing........if it lets go big time on a RHD Mini you are sat right behind it!
Good point, A friend of a friend lost his foot back in the day when his flywheel came off !!!!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users