
5,7 or 8 port - pros and cons etc etc
#1
Posted 08 March 2006 - 08:16 AM
#2
Posted 08 March 2006 - 11:26 AM
5-port
+ cheap (as in free if you already own a mini!)
+ well known
+ cheap (relatively) carb setup
- does not have potential to breathe (and therefore perform) as well as the others
7-port
- Its sold by minisport
- no-one really knows yet if the casting issues have been fixed
- expensive for what it is
- expensive twin carbs needed
8-port
+ loadsa potential for high power
+ bill richards can tune them!
- expensive
- expensive twin carbs needed
- different cam needed (IIRC, it uses completely different timing.....?)
As I say, I stand to be corrected. My comments are just what I recall from old posts over the various boards.
by the way, I'll be going 8-port!
#3
Posted 08 March 2006 - 12:12 PM
5 port tuning is going to cost the least (relatively), and if you keep if NA then your looking at a maximum power of about 130-140bhp which will cost you upwards from 2.5k depending on where you go (don't go to MiniSpares, MiniSport, MiniSpeed, they are parts suppliers, not engine builders!).
16V I think just has the edge over 8 port interms of power, but I believe it costs a bit more. The Webster brothers have KAD 16Vers each with 165bhp and 185bhp and they are really quick. Expect a built engine from KAD to cost upwards from 8k depending on spec. Simon at Morspeed has recently devloped a 16V head. I believe the conversion kit costs about 2.5k, so add that to the cost of a short and gearbox, etc. I think it would be slightly cheaper than KAD in the end though.
Then you have the traditional 8 port. Personally my favourite since it has heritage going back to the glory rallying years. Don't go for the Weslake head, the angle of the exhaust manifold makes them prone to cracking. The Arden design is superior, and you can get many engine builders to create you an engine with this head; Bil Richards (as recommended by MiniSpares), MED, Morspeed, MBE, etc. When I went to Bill Richards to see if he could 8 port my 1425 he said I could expect about 170-180bhp and twice the amount of torque I currently have (so near to 190lbl/ft!!). Expect an 8 port engine, fully built to cost upwards from 7k.
#4
Posted 08 March 2006 - 01:29 PM
I have some experience with tuning turbo cars, and based on the 944 turbo we tried things out on, the 16v head actually LOST power compared to an 8v head with similar flow "numbers". Why this is, we haven't quite figured out yet.
Whether or it was the combustion/inlet chamber shape, or the huge turbo, or just that the twin-inlet doesn't like it is a question I don't have the answers to, needless to say companies like Suzuki have smaller capacity/smaller turbo 16v that work fine....... (so it was probably just me!

#5
Posted 08 March 2006 - 01:38 PM
And don't forget the Jack Knight 16 valve too, the price on that is supposed to be coming down massively this year. If they EVER get their new website finished then I suppose we'll ge tto find out more about it.
Edited by Dan, 08 March 2006 - 01:39 PM.
#6
Posted 08 March 2006 - 01:59 PM
#7
Posted 08 March 2006 - 02:15 PM
#8
Posted 08 March 2006 - 03:27 PM
only problem with the 8 port is the need for extras such as new cams etc, the 7 port dont require these
Is the 7 port head worth the hassle of doing or would it be better just to stick with the 5 port and dream of the 16v?
#9
Posted 08 March 2006 - 04:44 PM
The only things you save on the 7-port is the cam, the exhaust and the rework.
But then that's just bolting on the bits yourself. The trick is in getting the balance of the complete motor right (which would mean paying a proper builder ca £7k)
Swings & roundabouts really........
#10
Posted 08 March 2006 - 09:41 PM
As for the siamese exhaust problem
The minor drawback of it was having 1 siamesed exhaust port.
This is non existant. It is actually beneficial apparently. Its to do with the exhaust pulses at certain revs. Ill dig out my bible and give some more indepth info on this.
Attached Files
#11
Posted 08 March 2006 - 11:39 PM
Attached Files
#12
Posted 08 March 2006 - 11:50 PM
hell yeah, would much rather have that than a vtec, although i wouldnt say no if someone wanted to buy one for me, lolId much rather have the front end of my mini look like this....................no comparison really........is there?
I really want a 7 port head now, big power benefits of the 8 port but with the ability to use the 5 port cams etc.
Oldschool - just been reading your project thread and those carbs look amazing, i love them. Just wish I had enough to get an engine like yours
#13
Posted 09 March 2006 - 12:01 AM

Ive heard loads of good things about the other coversions but this one suited me better than the rest. I know this may sound petty but one thing that was important to me was that the exhaust note must sound like a Mini's exhaust note usually does, all be it a bit louder. Because of the 3 exhaust ports, it still retains this.
#14
Posted 09 March 2006 - 12:01 AM
#15
Posted 09 March 2006 - 01:45 AM
Although my challenge will be in using parts that have been used before, I want to have to think about using them in a way that they haven't been used before. That's what challenges a person; His intellect, not the size of his tool box.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users