![Photo](https://www.theminiforum.co.uk/forums/uploads/profile/photo-thumb-766.jpg?_r=0)
Full Carbon Fibre Sprint
#16
Posted 22 December 2011 - 09:32 PM
#17
Posted 22 December 2011 - 10:19 PM
#18
Posted 23 December 2011 - 08:00 AM
you have to paint them, and they will still rust.....
#19
Posted 23 December 2011 - 05:55 PM
I know carbon is stronger than steel - but it has always seemed to have a little more 'give' in my opinion... Does the car not feel a bit flexy when hammering it through bends?
#20
Posted 23 December 2011 - 05:58 PM
interesting how people are comparing to heritage shells
you have to paint them, and they will still rust.....
interesting how people are comparing to heritage shells
you have to paint them, and they will still rust.....
Love these - but the cost of painting a heritage shell will surely = the cost / kit needed for an Iva.
Edited by Midas Mk1, 23 December 2011 - 05:58 PM.
#21
Posted 23 December 2011 - 06:55 PM
If it was much more than that, I'd buy a minus shell I think.
What sort of price would these be for sale, if you do put them into production? also, how thick is the CF?
EDIT- just realised that they come with boot, bonnet and doors (unlike a minus) and so I reckon I'd be prepared to pay a bit more, but I don't think I'd pay more that 4.5k
Edited by JustSteve, 23 December 2011 - 06:57 PM.
#22
Posted 23 December 2011 - 07:42 PM
I'd be happy with 4k ish......so come on, what are you thinking as a rough figure?
#23
Posted 23 December 2011 - 07:52 PM
Is that a 'black metal' shell (lots of cloth laid up for an 'isotropic' laminate with through-bolts and spreaders for loadbearing) or do we have UD in there with structural foam/honeycomb and Ti inserts etc? Wet layup and vacuum bagged or vacuum infused/prepreg and autoclaved? Cure temp? (what proportion of that is fibre, what proportion is resin)
It looks like a solid iso layup, wet or vacuum infused, and vac bagged/low temp cured from the photos. Doesn't make best use of the material properties, but the kit looks nice and complete!
Metal rollhoop and metal frontends are a definitely a good idea; they soak up masses of energy and deformation in the event of a shunt. Thought about a shell that (structurally) finished at a rear bulkhead, with a purely cosmetic bum moulding? (could be part of the same layup, just lightly laid and lightly glued on) Take wherever the back of a front seat would finish/the main rollhoop would sit and build structurally to there. (composite safety cell) Use ironmongery to support both front and rear subframes:
http://www.cartype.c...rbon-tub_11.jpg
http://www.egarage.c...-carbon-tub.jpg
http://theblogofcars...enmp412c035.jpg
http://63.240.88.234...ght-savings.jpg
Pop UD and structural foam around the door openings and where a rollhoop would usually go (basically lay a spaceframe into there) and you'd have a very interesting proposition.
#24
Posted 23 December 2011 - 08:02 PM
![:ohno:](https://www.theminiforum.co.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/ohno.gif)
Gotta be worth £6k all day
#25
Posted 26 December 2011 - 06:46 PM
#26
Posted 26 December 2011 - 07:05 PM
Also, probably stiffer than a steel shell (again, if it's the design I'm thinking of).
Very, very interesting piece of kit.
£5k minimum, realistically though, I guess it's all about the market. I know if I had £5k to spend on a heritage shell, I'd rather go for a CF sprint instead.
#27
Posted 26 December 2011 - 09:12 PM
how much are you selling them for
#28
Posted 26 December 2011 - 09:57 PM
#29
Posted 27 December 2011 - 12:25 AM
#30
Posted 27 December 2011 - 12:39 AM
![:P](https://www.theminiforum.co.uk/forums/public/style_emoticons/default/tongue.png)
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users