Was meaning the little cartoon thingy at the bottom of your post Kappa, the red and black clubman. Don't panic son, i'm not serious, actualy taking it as a compliment!
Mini Stance
#1471
Posted 18 December 2012 - 08:43 AM
#1472
Posted 18 December 2012 - 10:14 AM
Rear wheel arch casually falling off here.
Got bored of the pink so put the bands back on.
#1473
Posted 18 December 2012 - 10:16 AM
#1474
Posted 18 December 2012 - 06:22 PM
If their both not there, nothing to test... Thats what i was told!
That's what my initial reaction was, but when you look into the ideas that the ministry/vosa have in mot's its crazy.
Not in regards to mirrors, for a car to pass an mot it must have a drivers side mirror, and one other mirror. It doesn't matter if the additional mirror is on the passenger side door or a rear view one, as long as its one on the drivers side then one more.
Either way, this car is a trailer queen and earns no respect from me
not true a mini built in early 1960 doesnt need any wing mirrors. it can still pas an mot. i know i had one last month.
#1475
Posted 18 December 2012 - 06:25 PM
Not exactly Stance but though i should share it
what year is this from. and were is it taken
#1476
Posted 18 December 2012 - 07:10 PM
Not exactly Stance but though i should share it
what year is this from. and were is it taken
2007 Silverston Pole on grid
#1477
Posted 18 December 2012 - 10:09 PM
If their both not there, nothing to test... Thats what i was told!
That's what my initial reaction was, but when you look into the ideas that the ministry/vosa have in mot's its crazy.
Not in regards to mirrors, for a car to pass an mot it must have a drivers side mirror, and one other mirror. It doesn't matter if the additional mirror is on the passenger side door or a rear view one, as long as its one on the drivers side then one more.
Either way, this car is a trailer queen and earns no respect from me
not true a mini built in early 1960 doesnt need any wing mirrors. it can still pas an mot. i know i had one last month.
I was still kind of on the subject of the car that started the conversation. Which is clearly not an early 1960 mini
#1478
Posted 18 December 2012 - 10:56 PM
I was still kind of on the subject of the car that started the conversation. Which is clearly not an early 1960 mini
If their both not there, nothing to test... Thats what i was told!
That's what my initial reaction was, but when you look into the ideas that the ministry/vosa have in mot's its crazy.
Not in regards to mirrors, for a car to pass an mot it must have a drivers side mirror, and one other mirror. It doesn't matter if the additional mirror is on the passenger side door or a rear view one, as long as its one on the drivers side then one more.
Either way, this car is a trailer queen and earns no respect from me
not true a mini built in early 1960 doesnt need any wing mirrors. it can still pas an mot. i know i had one last month.
there is a rule of if its not on the car it cant be tested but this only applies to things that are not mandatory like, if you car is made after the seat belt law, you need seat belts, same with wing mirrors, etc unless your car was made before the mandatory date, abit like road tax......i know this because i have a stone chip in my window and the mot failed, so i jokingly said to the MOT man, if i take the window out would it pass? he said yes, i just have to put a note on the advisories that it has no window fitted. so 2 years running ive took my mini back with no windscreen and passed
#1479
Posted 19 December 2012 - 09:28 AM
If their both not there, nothing to test... Thats what i was told!
That's what my initial reaction was, but when you look into the ideas that the ministry/vosa have in mot's its crazy.
Not in regards to mirrors, for a car to pass an mot it must have a drivers side mirror, and one other mirror. It doesn't matter if the additional mirror is on the passenger side door or a rear view one, as long as its one on the drivers side then one more.
Either way, this car is a trailer queen and earns no respect from me
not true a mini built in early 1960 doesnt need any wing mirrors. it can still pas an mot. i know i had one last month.
I was still kind of on the subject of the car that started the conversation. Which is clearly not an early 1960 mini
ok matey, just letting everyone else know
#1480
Posted 19 December 2012 - 09:30 AM
Not exactly Stance but though i should share it
what year is this from. and were is it taken
2007 Silverston Pole on grid
im sure i was there then.
wasnt that the fastest mini in the world comp, ran with extreme mighty minis.
did pete edwards win in the yellow vauxhall mini.
i cannot remember seeing the red one, were is it now
#1481
Posted 19 December 2012 - 12:45 PM
Not exactly Stance but though i should share it
what year is this from. and were is it taken
2007 Silverston Pole on grid
im sure i was there then.
wasnt that the fastest mini in the world comp, ran with extreme mighty minis.
did pete edwards win in the yellow vauxhall mini.
i cannot remember seeing the red one, were is it now
Yes it was!. As for my memory something went wrong with petes car when qualifying and he started way back on the grid. Red one couldnt finish the race had an oil pressure problem and had to stop. to be honest am not so sure about the year tho, ithink it was 2006 or 2007. Sold the mini to Endaf Owens.
#1482
Posted 19 December 2012 - 01:03 PM
#1483
Posted 19 December 2012 - 01:07 PM
If their both not there, nothing to test... Thats what i was told!
That's what my initial reaction was, but when you look into the ideas that the ministry/vosa have in mot's its crazy.
Not in regards to mirrors, for a car to pass an mot it must have a drivers side mirror, and one other mirror. It doesn't matter if the additional mirror is on the passenger side door or a rear view one, as long as its one on the drivers side then one more.
Either way, this car is a trailer queen and earns no respect from me
not true a mini built in early 1960 doesnt need any wing mirrors. it can still pas an mot. i know i had one last month.
I was still kind of on the subject of the car that started the conversation. Which is clearly not an early 1960 mini
ok matey, just letting everyone else know
guys this is a 1993 mini sprite lol I dont know why in the picture it dosent have side mirrors, but the car does have mirrors. Check this out
#1484
Posted 19 December 2012 - 01:09 PM
Great colour mate! :)What do you think? On its way to stance or could do better? need advice before I get it on the road
#1485
Posted 19 December 2012 - 01:54 PM
What do you think? On its way to stance or could do better? need advice before I get it on the road
Seeing as "stance" on TMF means lowered a bit, I'd say it's bang on.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users