
Supercharger Systems
#1
Posted 25 October 2011 - 11:11 PM
I've just agreed my final year degree project, I'm studying Automotive engineering at Sunderland Uni and I'm looking at the supercharger systems that are currently available on the market for the Mini... Analysing the benifits and limitations of each system with the aim of producing an improved manifold design.
If you have a supercharged classic Mini, it would be great if you could attach a photo of your engine to this post with the engine specs and power figures of your set up.
Thanks in advance.
Jon.
#2
Posted 26 October 2011 - 08:31 AM
#3
Posted 26 October 2011 - 01:21 PM
Ah I see, well if you can, give me a shout. Even so, if you don't mind me asking, what spec is your set up and how much power/torque are you producing?ive got some real nice new pics of my setup but i cant upload them:(
Cheers, Jon.
#4
Posted 26 October 2011 - 09:36 PM
12G295 Head 8.7:1 CR Minispares EN race spec valves
Water injection at 5PSI (.70 nozzle before charger)
Bike Carb
SC12 supercharger 7-10PSI (Dependant on Revs)

#5
Posted 27 October 2011 - 06:49 AM
#6
Posted 27 October 2011 - 07:20 AM


1293cc . fully forged ballenced lightend . 276 cam . hif44 aldon dizzy .( soon to be megajolt) power unknown never had it on a dyno
Edited by new_zealand _minis, 27 October 2011 - 07:24 AM.
#7
Posted 27 October 2011 - 08:34 AM
#8
Posted 27 October 2011 - 08:47 AM
#9
Posted 27 October 2011 - 11:02 AM
Ah I see, cool stuff.yes it does .and it has a in filter heater
#10
Posted 28 October 2011 - 12:51 AM
I would eliminate induction type from the project really and look at injection. But not just chucking a throttle body in place of the carb.
Take a read through this.
http://www.starchak.ca/efi/siamese.htm
#11
Posted 28 October 2011 - 08:02 AM
as with mine . i know i built that motor to wistand way more power than the eaton will chuck at it ..
i want more power but i just wont see it with eaton suck through .. i just dont know if i want to go through the hassle of it anymore and the cash
or i would go turbo
just going to do megajolt to sort out the pinking ( that the aldon dizzy shuld have ) then i will leave it
Edited by new_zealand _minis, 28 October 2011 - 08:04 AM.
#12
Posted 28 October 2011 - 09:36 AM
Thanks for the reply, yeah that is probably going to be the main focus, there are arguments for each depending on the required power. I'll have a look, cheers.Suck through vs blow though is what you should be looking at if you're looking at supercharger systems alone.
I would eliminate induction type from the project really and look at injection. But not just chucking a throttle body in place of the carb.
Take a read through this.
http://www.starchak.ca/efi/siamese.htm
#13
Posted 28 October 2011 - 03:02 PM
Thanks for the reply, yeah that is probably going to be the main focus, there are arguments for each depending on the required power. I'll have a look, cheers.
Suck through vs blow though is what you should be looking at if you're looking at supercharger systems alone.
I would eliminate induction type from the project really and look at injection. But not just chucking a throttle body in place of the carb.
Take a read through this.
http://www.starchak.ca/efi/siamese.htm
Well, i wouldn't say there are arguments for each. The single point injection injection system on the 5 port doesn't solve the problem really. All it gives you is slightly more control. You still get the same problem of fuel distribution with the carb, in fact id say its possibly worse due to shots of fuel being fired as opposed to constant atomisation.
If you look at the kit from specialist components, they will argue the point with you all day long. But you pull a head off an engine that their injection system has been on. The outer cylinders will run leaner.
#14
Posted 28 October 2011 - 03:08 PM


YetI
#15
Posted 28 October 2011 - 04:50 PM

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users