Have you fault tested the rest of the ignition system??
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75358/75358b021484f26899dafe457d3b3a3310846113" alt=":ph34r:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/999b4/999b4c14699d024f1e244cf6c3b171ee689f1c12" alt=":blink:"
Just to clarify.. the mini runs properly when the alarm is NOT turned off.. Hmmmm..
Posted 17 May 2006 - 09:56 AM
Have you fault tested the rest of the ignition system??
Posted 06 September 2006 - 12:17 PM
Posted 06 September 2006 - 09:47 PM
Edited by Mini Sprocket, 24 November 2006 - 12:16 AM.
Posted 10 September 2006 - 03:05 PM
Edited by Black_Pearl, 10 September 2006 - 03:09 PM.
Posted 10 September 2006 - 05:32 PM
Posted 12 September 2006 - 08:13 PM
Well, by Rover I (probably foolishly) meant the main dealers that were (Harwoods) in Pulborough, West Sussex.
I tend to agree with you, I have had 8 Mini's now, but all old ones ( and never a 1275) It's the fuel injection system that I am a little unsure over.
I have got a hold of a complete SPI unit from ebay, including entire injection unit, temperature sensor and fuel trap etc.
i will fit next weekend when I have got a new lambda, as Im sure the old one must be screwed with such a rich mixture!
If this doesn't fix the problem, I don't feel I should just throw parts at the car, I will take it to a mini specialist. My main problem is lack of time as I am out of the house 12 hours a day and have very busy weekends.
I really appreciate everyones advice, I certainly feel I understand a lot more about the SPI system, which can only be a good thing.
Posted 22 September 2006 - 06:27 AM
Posted 24 November 2006 - 12:21 AM
i think there seems to be an overall problem with 1992 spi coopers. the earlier ones ran off the double block ecu (the ecu had 2 connecting blocks for the loom) and the later ones came with the single block and it so continued as such.
i have posted another topic on here about lambda readings in which i know sprocket has had a look and suggested some solutions to very perculiar and severe problems i have been experiencing:
i have a new 1293 with fast road cam, standard head and all the other bits standard bar k&n and back box. my lambda sensor was playing up or so i thought and it was reading a fixed 2.1v. after changing the ecu for 3 different ones, the lambda sensor, substituing the lambda relay, changing entire injection bodies and stepper motors etc, the loom, fuel traps, different elbows and pipes for the vacuums, closing over the breather rails and all to a varying degree of success or not should the case be. the only thing i havent changed or substitued so far is a air temp sensor! i even changed my ignition to a different non-spliced one and removed my alarm that was fitted during engine change.
my emissions were the only thing that i had to pass for MOT. the final result was a pass but only after having different 'everything' in my car. previous emissions tests read off the scale apparently!! the only thing i have not changed is the loom and ecu to the single block type (to which i am keeping an eye out for). i think this might well help my problems. the last time i read my sensors the map was about 47 when warm and on idle, the lambda read about 1.5-1.6v on idle and dropping with increasing revs, the coolant was at about 90 and i guess my emissions were also lower. this was obviously helped with a new cat though as the old one was pretty stuffed!
thoughts and suggestions such as a big bore exhaust giving no backpressure have been ignorantly and possibly stupidly ignored. other suggestions such as manifold air leaks have been taken into consideration and checked and have resulted in my breather rail being blocked off and will soon be removed totally. my air filter also could have been addressed and probably contribute slightly as its in a dirty order.
i dont think there is possibly anything elsewhere that i could check or change. i took the car to an auto sparks and he just suggested that the map sensor in the ecu was at fault. he said he doubts an earthing somewhere or a short somehwere they shouldnt. all harness earths were checked and in good order. EVERYTHING bar the very few things i have mentioned above have been addressed and havent resulted in a 'YES - that was the problem, the car is now fixed'.
so if you have a 92 spi and are having problems, think about what i have said and see if you should think deeper than you might do normally if you come across fueling problems!!
EDIT - and what do you mean 'rover' want to charge you £70 an hour, where are you living and who are you going to? i didnt think rover existed to do that kind of thing anymore!! and even if they did im told that YOU would have more of an idea of anything and everything compared to themselves!!!
Posted 24 November 2006 - 08:43 AM
Posted 31 January 2007 - 06:42 PM
Edited by Jimi30, 31 January 2007 - 06:43 PM.
Posted 09 March 2007 - 12:20 PM
Posted 22 March 2007 - 07:28 PM
Posted 01 April 2007 - 11:34 AM
Hi,
As I am currently having problems with a 93 SPI cooper passing it's MOT emissions test this thread has proved particularly informative. I'm new to mini's and it has been something of a suprise to find that the engine management system on later cars had been developed as far as it has. I suppose we can say that at least we are doing our bit to save the planet. During my quest to understand the subject further I came across what looks like the offical Rover Workshop documentation on the subject (No doubt someone will correct me if I'm wrong). The document certainly brought everything together in one place and described the workings of the system very well. The following link should get you to the document.
Rover MEMS MPI/SPI Document
My cooper is currently sat awaiting retesting of emissions having failed on a particularly high CO reading. Prior to the test I could not say I had noticed anything wrong. The engine seemed to be the least of my worries. I may return for some guidance should my inital attempts at resolving this issue fail
Posted 08 May 2007 - 10:07 PM
Posted 08 May 2007 - 11:26 PM
A couple of years ago the old engine popped and I had an MG metro engine dropped in, I read in this thread that the spi system doesn't respond well to the MG metro cam would this explain my lumpy idle and overfuelling? The other thing I have done is fit a single box centre exit system and a de-cat as the cat collapsed.
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users