Rear Subframe Or Beam Axle
#1
Posted 13 June 2011 - 06:15 PM
http://www.minispare...mp;prod_id=2545
anyone done this conversion?
#2
Posted 13 June 2011 - 06:17 PM
#3
Posted 13 June 2011 - 06:27 PM
That said if it's going on anything but a stripped out fast raod/track car then there are better ways of spending the money.
#4
Posted 13 June 2011 - 07:21 PM
#5
Posted 13 June 2011 - 11:49 PM
Im just wondering what is best, standard rear subframe or rear beam axle?
http://www.minispare...mp;prod_id=2545
anyone done this conversion?
The question then is "Best for what"?
For ordinary road use a standard sub-frame is probably best as it gives strength to the rear end in the event of some idiot driving into the back of your car.
For racing, hill-climbing or sprinting, then some sort of rear beam is best (so long as the regulations allow it).
#6
Posted 14 June 2011 - 08:18 AM
#7
Posted 14 June 2011 - 08:56 AM
It would be for just general day to day
I just thought it would be for better handling and less things to worry about going wrong.
#8
Posted 14 June 2011 - 09:24 AM
Yes it is lighter but not as safe and no real advantage for road use.
#9
Posted 14 June 2011 - 09:56 AM
A beam frame is a glorified subframe pure and simple.....
A beam axle is a performance enhancing suspension system.....
#10
Posted 14 June 2011 - 10:07 AM
I don't think it will affect your handling on a road car, and an un-modified shell with coil overs IMO will flex more than a subframe'd car due to all the forces being confined to the wheel wells/turrets, whereas with a subframe it is nicely distributed throughout the rear.
Yes it is lighter but not as safe and no real advantage for road use.
I totally agree. There really is no advantage for a road car. I.ve never fancied all the weight of my car being supported where the dampers mount, it's just not strong enough.
As it happens, one of my mini-based kit cars has a frame and coilovers at the rear, it handles just like a mini on a subframe. the shell is strenghtened to take the weight though.
#11
Posted 14 June 2011 - 10:25 AM
Hi C4NNON, Are you confusing beam frames with beam axles here ?
A beam frame is a glorified subframe pure and simple.....
A beam axle is a performance enhancing suspension system.....
Martin I pride myself in being one of the very few people on here who DOES know the difference between a beam axle and a rear beam or whatever people want to call the common things stuck to the heal board!
I stand by what I said though, do you disagree?
#12
Posted 14 June 2011 - 10:35 AM
I have posted the photo's on here before clearly showing my method for fixing to the shell..... if you removed the body shell from the seat rearwards it would still function correctly.
Flex of th ebody shell is also taken care of by my device, however it can be improved upon.....
The improved turn in was out of this world, and that was on a standard front end.
#13
Posted 14 June 2011 - 02:28 PM
#14
Posted 14 June 2011 - 03:50 PM
True, but I thought we were talking about a rear beam like the link in the original post rather than an axle, do you have a link to your beam axle'd mods?
The OP said "beam axle"..... so I assumed they were asking about a beam axle and not a beam frame ??
#15
Posted 14 June 2011 - 04:05 PM
True, but I thought we were talking about a rear beam like the link in the original post rather than an axle, do you have a link to your beam axle'd mods?
The OP said "beam axle"..... so I assumed they were asking about a beam axle and not a beam frame ??
That's because most of them aren't advertised correctly and most people call a rear beams/beam frames/etc a beam axle which isn't correct.
I posted these on a topic several months ago to show the difference for joe bloggs.
Rear Beam set up
Beam Axle
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users