Injection
#16
Posted 07 January 2006 - 10:15 PM
#17
Posted 07 January 2006 - 10:19 PM
Use the throttle body and injector of a spi and then use megasquirt to run it.
Do you reckon yoiu can get to work ed4ran??
#18
Posted 07 January 2006 - 10:22 PM
#19
Posted 07 January 2006 - 10:36 PM
#20
Posted 07 January 2006 - 10:46 PM
dave
#21
Posted 07 January 2006 - 10:56 PM
Working on it right now. The throttle needs to be removed as the injector is the wrong side of it. A throttle boddy from a rover turbo would then need to be fitted between the injection body and turbo/intercooler.how hard you think its going to be to seal it all for turbo use?
Good thing with the spi injector is that it produces a conical spray pattern rather than a jet. This, I recon would replicate the HIF44 carb. Also the fuel regulator would need slight mods to get it to be boost sensative. A plenum to replace the filter will need fabricating held down by the three original bolts.
Only thoughts at the minute, may even put the 16valver on hold for a bit longer and do this.
Currently sourcing a bigger injector.
#22
Posted 07 January 2006 - 10:57 PM
Lack of control of the fueling why did they do away with carbs and go to injection in the first placewhy the hell would u want to use the electronic carb from an spi, i mean an su carb if all rebuilt/working correctly will out perform that junk anyday
dave
#23
Posted 07 January 2006 - 11:06 PM
If u want a large injector for an spi either rover 200 jobby or one from like a 1.6 pug from around 92 will do fine as me mums pug 205 1.6 has basically the same throttle body as a spi
dave
#24
Posted 07 January 2006 - 11:35 PM
#25
Posted 07 January 2006 - 11:53 PM
LolAftermarket Injetion on an A-series - ooh, what a good idea! I might have to try that. Sounds pretty simple really
Not sure how to take that :cheese:
#26
Posted 07 January 2006 - 11:56 PM
Two spi injectors and manifolds, with one throttle body providing both?
and how hard is it going to be to modify the fuel pressure?
All sounds tempting :grin: maybe i should have a play!! might have to start with getting MS going with standard SPI stuff.
#27
Posted 07 January 2006 - 11:58 PM
Its not overly complicated. I've seen a twin single point throttle/injector body set up made up but not working yet, all ready to go. They guy never new about Megasquirt which could drive the two injectors
#28
Posted 08 January 2006 - 12:00 AM
No, it was two throttles and injectors and one manifold. Ill speak to the bloke see if I can get some picturesWhat about the twin spi thing? you reckon that would work?
Two spi injectors and manifolds, with one throttle body providing both?
and how hard is it going to be to modify the fuel pressure?
All sounds tempting :grin: maybe i should have a play!! might have to start with getting MS going with standard SPI stuff.
#29
Posted 08 January 2006 - 11:03 AM
I am that bloke
Cheers Mini Sprocket.
correct not two manifolds (where would you put that lot?) just the one.
I need to correct you on one bit Mini Sprocket, it does work and always did, although in a fashion because, like you say, i had no driver for the 2nd injector.
I drove the car with it on, no leaks, around the block a couple of times, just leak & 'fouling' checks, of which there were none.
I have never really pursued much, the need for an amplifier which is all it needs to run the second injector from the original ecu trigger.
I made this assembly 7 or 8 years ago! with standard parts original for the spi.
an opinion for you: - the advantage of carbs is limited to the fact that they allow the engine to draw what fuel it wants at low revs in particular, hence the ability to run wilder cams that in an injected form that 'gives' fuel whether needed or not, causing tuning difficulties as a result of cam overlaps etc.
This advantage is quickly affected by the rolling road tuning limitations of the likes of (no matter how well set up) su's, which would always be the best carb'd choice for most, for historical and originality/practicality reasons. They are not able to be adjusted for incremental rev range & load fuelling, only 'near' fuelling due to the millions of jets not being accurate for each individual engine.
Peter Baldwin (you either know him or you don't) set up my car as spi, to 95bhp with more accurate fuelling than a later setup with twin 1 & 1/2" su's, although with su's i had a slightly wilder cam and about 5bhp more.
can't post pic, it won't let me, i enjoy cars and bikes more than computers, the file is too big i think.
Attached Files
#30
Posted 08 January 2006 - 01:06 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users