If the car is being used on the road, why change the original set-up? There is also the question of rear impact protection without the rear subframe.
Beam Axel Pros And Cons?
Started by
tieclubbyestate
, Mar 11 2011 12:20 PM
19 replies to this topic
#17
tieclubbyestate
-
- Members
-
- 539 posts
BANNED
Posted 11 March 2011 - 09:37 PM
i want to know if its worth it will it be much better for road use??If the car is being used on the road, why change the original set-up? There is also the question of rear impact protection without the rear subframe.
#18
Cooperman
-
- TMF+ Member
-
- 23,276 posts
Uncle Cooperman, Voted Mr TMF 2011
- Location: Cambs.
- Local Club: MCR, HAMOC, Chelmsford M.C.
Posted 12 March 2011 - 11:55 PM
i want to know if its worth it will it be much better for road use??If the car is being used on the road, why change the original set-up? There is also the question of rear impact protection without the rear subframe.
Better in what way?
#19
tieclubbyestate
-
- Members
-
- 539 posts
BANNED
Posted 13 March 2011 - 12:35 AM
like would it be worth it for the handling or shal i keep my subby, what i mean is does the cost better the price of the beam?i want to know if its worth it will it be much better for road use??If the car is being used on the road, why change the original set-up? There is also the question of rear impact protection without the rear subframe.
Better in what way?
#20
Ethel
-
- TMF Team
-
- 25,919 posts
..is NOT a girl!
- Local Club: none
Posted 13 March 2011 - 12:45 AM
The only real difference to handling & cornering will be the springs ablity to keep the tyres in contact with the road without allowing too much body roll. That depends as much on what weight is compressing the springs. I'd stick with rubber if the car carries a full load.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
