
Headlight Pattern
#1
Posted 17 February 2011 - 09:18 PM
Year:1984
Hi,
Recently had mini reMOTd and refailed, this time the indicators werent amber enough and the head light pattern was wrong.
the mechanic informed and showed me that if facing a wall in your car, the light from your headligths should form a flat horizontal line accross the wall. The light from my headlights is round (as you might imagine from round headlamps). Short of sticking tape of the top of the light waht should I do?
Thanks for your help.
:
Any non-standard parts that might be involved with the problem?
#2
Posted 17 February 2011 - 09:21 PM
#3
Posted 17 February 2011 - 09:21 PM
Model:City E 1000
Year:1984
Hi,
Recently had mini reMOTd and refailed, this time the indicators werent amber enough and the head light pattern was wrong.
the mechanic informed and showed me that if facing a wall in your car, the light from your headligths should form a flat horizontal line accross the wall. The light from my headlights is round (as you might imagine from round headlamps). Short of sticking tape of the top of the light waht should I do?
Thanks for your help.
:
I assume you have halogen lamps fitted. If you have the old sealed beam type then the mechanic is wrong.
The usual cause of bad beam patterns in halogeh lamps is the incorrect seating of the bulb in the holder.
Any non-standard parts that might be involved with the problem?
#4
Posted 17 February 2011 - 09:28 PM
#5
Posted 17 February 2011 - 09:29 PM
I'm thinking these might be halogen lamps in crystal headlamps- which don't have the beam correction lenses, in which case they'd have to be swapped out.
#6
Posted 17 February 2011 - 09:33 PM
Lights were checked dipped.
just checked , left light Lucas right light wagner, both single bulb sealed units.
how likely is it that they are illegal?
#7
Posted 17 February 2011 - 09:39 PM
" both single bulb sealed units??"These sound like sealed beams . they can be identified easily, the whole unit is made of glass with 3 terminals on the back and there is no seperate bulb.all our parts are standard (apart from indicators).
Lights were checked dipped.
just checked , left light Lucas right light wagner, both single bulb sealed units.
how likely is it that they are illegal?
These should be checked on main beam and all you get is a roundish light in the beam setter.
#8
Posted 17 February 2011 - 09:46 PM
Edited by tommy13, 17 February 2011 - 09:48 PM.
#9
Posted 17 February 2011 - 09:46 PM
MOT "nearside front (no pattern) headlamp not working on dipped beam"
the lights are definitely working but as he showed us, the light forms two circles on the world (no flat top edge).
#10
Posted 17 February 2011 - 09:48 PM
I may have misunderstood what you mean by sealed unit. Is there a letter E in a circle usually cast into the glass on the front of the lamp?.
yes, E11 in circle and the number 7603.
#11
Posted 17 February 2011 - 09:54 PM
See here, Inspection manual for classes 3,4,5 and 7 vehicles - contents - section 1 (Lighting and Signalling Equipment) - headlamp aim and click next page until you find the pictures of differing headlamp aims, sealed beams are usually like the british american ones, hope this helps

http://www.transport...lsandguides.htm
Edited by cambiker71, 17 February 2011 - 10:00 PM.
#12
Posted 17 February 2011 - 09:56 PM
http://www.ukclassic...sealed-beam.asp
#13
Posted 17 February 2011 - 10:05 PM
Did it have a flat side? The unit may be in approx 1/3 of a turn out, that would give a curved top and the patent that should be at the top would be either at the bottom left or bottom right of the beam.three terminals sounds about right and pretty sure we cant separate the bulb from the unit. The unit is glass on front and metal casing at back.
MOT "nearside front (no pattern) headlamp not working on dipped beam"
the lights are definitely working but as he showed us, the light forms two circles on the world (no flat top edge).
#14
Posted 17 February 2011 - 10:23 PM
thank you all for your links and advice so far. I have gone out and taken a picture of my beams on a wall and attached them. They seem reasonable to me, am I wrong? (left is dipped, right is main)
Attached Files
Edited by Bock, 17 February 2011 - 10:25 PM.
#15
Posted 17 February 2011 - 10:31 PM
Hi,
thank you all for your links and advice so far. I have gone out and taken a picture of my beams on a wall and attached them. They seem reasonable to me, am I wrong? (left is dipped, right is main)
Looks normal enough to me, check me previous posts link and you'll see what i mean, i doubt the tester has seen this beam image type before if he's under 30!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users