
Is It Worth Going For The Twin Hs2's?
#16
Posted 11 January 2011 - 07:38 PM
#17
Posted 11 January 2011 - 08:42 PM
Here's a bit of info regarding the power delivered by twin carbs compared to singles. As you can see a single 1.75" carb will give the same power as twin 1.25" carbs at 50-100bhp so comes down to throttle response I guess. Also there was a discussion about Carbs http://www.theminifo...hp/t113083.html
Surely a lot of it is down to the suitability of the inlet manifold. If a 1.75" carb was mounted on a standard 998 cast iron manifold and that was compared to a polished and modified alloy twin manifold with 2 x HS2's, then the HS2's would flow better due to the straight-in nature of the inlet tracts. Maybe the issue with a Mini is the inability to get a really straight-ish run into the head from a single because of the proximity of the bulkhead.
Take the 1275 GT with its single carb and 55 bhp, then consider the Innocenti 1300 of the same era with, technically, the same block. The Inno with twin 1.25" SU's gives 75 bhp compared to the GT which struggles to achieve 55 bhp. The Inno has the same head with the same size valves and the standard 510 cam (different part number, but the same profile). The 1275 GT inlet manifold really was junk.
#18
Posted 11 January 2011 - 10:33 PM
Cheers for the good discussion, this forum really is brilliant

#19
Posted 25 February 2015 - 08:02 PM
Here's a bit of info regarding the power delivered by twin carbs compared to singles. As you can see a single 1.75" carb will give the same power as twin 1.25" carbs at 50-100bhp so comes down to throttle response I guess. Also there was a discussion about Carbs http://www.theminifo...hp/t113083.html
Surely a lot of it is down to the suitability of the inlet manifold. If a 1.75" carb was mounted on a standard 998 cast iron manifold and that was compared to a polished and modified alloy twin manifold with 2 x HS2's, then the HS2's would flow better due to the straight-in nature of the inlet tracts. Maybe the issue with a Mini is the inability to get a really straight-ish run into the head from a single because of the proximity of the bulkhead.
Take the 1275 GT with its single carb and 55 bhp, then consider the Innocenti 1300 of the same era with, technically, the same block. The Inno with twin 1.25" SU's gives 75 bhp compared to the GT which struggles to achieve 55 bhp. The Inno has the same head with the same size valves and the standard 510 cam (different part number, but the same profile). The 1275 GT inlet manifold really was junk.
What was the difference with the inno inlet? As I think the 1275GT did have twins too?
#20
Posted 25 February 2015 - 08:43 PM
What was the difference with the inno inlet? As I think the 1275GT did have twins too?Here's a bit of info regarding the power delivered by twin carbs compared to singles. As you can see a single 1.75" carb will give the same power as twin 1.25" carbs at 50-100bhp so comes down to throttle response I guess. Also there was a discussion about Carbs http://www.theminifo...hp/t113083.html
Surely a lot of it is down to the suitability of the inlet manifold. If a 1.75" carb was mounted on a standard 998 cast iron manifold and that was compared to a polished and modified alloy twin manifold with 2 x HS2's, then the HS2's would flow better due to the straight-in nature of the inlet tracts. Maybe the issue with a Mini is the inability to get a really straight-ish run into the head from a single because of the proximity of the bulkhead.
Take the 1275 GT with its single carb and 55 bhp, then consider the Innocenti 1300 of the same era with, technically, the same block. The Inno with twin 1.25" SU's gives 75 bhp compared to the GT which struggles to achieve 55 bhp. The Inno has the same head with the same size valves and the standard 510 cam (different part number, but the same profile). The 1275 GT inlet manifold really was junk.
No the GT did not.
#21
Posted 26 February 2015 - 12:08 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users