
How Fast ?
#76
Posted 03 January 2011 - 08:34 AM
#77
Posted 03 January 2011 - 08:42 AM
But i still fail to understand how it accellerated quicker than my 998 at the time (i think it was a high compression engine, had both block and head skimmed at minisport at some point before i bought the car), his will pull well to 90mph but not much more, so in theory i should have the shorter ratio and get to 70 faster than he can. Confused.
#78
Posted 03 January 2011 - 09:12 AM
#79
Posted 03 January 2011 - 09:38 AM
For any of the silly claims in this thread to be believed then they must be recorded going both ways on the same bit of road.
Below is a list of official top speeds and then calculations to suggest required bhp for mph in a Mini. as it happens one of my 998s has a terminal speed on the 1/4 mile of 104mph (at 7k) the other reached 103 at bruntinthorpe but I never ran it in the opposite direction which is a shame as I had to go uphill.
HP Speed Model
34 73 850 Mk 1
57 87 1275GT
90 101 MPI JC S Works
63 90 1.3 MPI
55 85 1961 998 Cooper
76 97 Cooper 1275S
29.69 70
44.32 80
63.1 90
86.56 100
115.21 110
131.64 115
149.57 120
190.17 130
237.51 140
292.13 150
354.54 160
425.26 170
504.8 180
593.7 190
692.46 200
#80
Posted 03 January 2011 - 09:42 AM
#81
Posted 03 January 2011 - 10:52 AM
my 998 goes at nearly 900mph (sat in a shed traveling with the rotation of the earth)
Wow


#82
Posted 03 January 2011 - 11:32 AM

out onto the autobahn that is
sorry about the dodgy picture, those autobahns are very bumpy
Edited by danrock101, 03 January 2011 - 11:34 AM.
#83
Posted 03 January 2011 - 01:43 PM
Another factor is that the later Minis have increased drag caused by the wheel arch extensions, those huge mirrors and the wider tyres which increase both the aerodynamic and the physical drag. The original cars had no wing mirrors as standard and narrow 3.5" wheels with 145 width tyres (well 5.20 x 10 on the pre-64 cars). That must make a lot of difference and I'm guessing here, but I reckon an 850 with very wide wheels and tyres plus those wide wing mirrors would be pushed to achieve 65 mph.
Then there is the issue of the gearing. If you modify the engine to give more top end power, the power band moves higher, so you need lower gearing to enable the car to pull into the max power area in top gear if it's max speed you are after. If, for example, you modified an MPI so that it gave 95 bhp at, say, 5700 rpm, with standard gearing you would never get there due to the sharp rise in drag before the engine came into the optimum power band.
#84
Posted 03 January 2011 - 01:46 PM
It was sheet ice and we were going up a steep hill...

Edited by RossKnight, 03 January 2011 - 01:47 PM.
#85
Posted 03 January 2011 - 01:50 PM
I had to go out and do a little test
out onto the autobahn that is
sorry about the dodgy picture, those autobahns are very bumpy
But did you have a sat nav or something showing how fastyou were actually going?
#86
Posted 03 January 2011 - 01:52 PM
I had to go out and do a little test
out onto the autobahn that is
sorry about the dodgy picture, those autobahns are very bumpy
Best get that fixed, the needles fallen off your speedo there.
#87
Posted 03 January 2011 - 02:00 PM
#88
Posted 03 January 2011 - 02:25 PM

#89
Posted 03 January 2011 - 02:26 PM
Its a big hill.I have a relatively fit 1000 and down hill it will manage about 95.Even with a stage 1 i would not expect more than a 100.If your after top speed then you need an engine that revs as mins are short geared.
Are you sure your speedo isn't in KMH?
#90
Posted 03 January 2011 - 02:33 PM
Its a big hill.I have a relatively fit 1000 and down hill it will manage about 95.Even with a stage 1 i would not expect more than a 100.If your after top speed then you need an engine that revs as mins are short geared.
Are you sure your speedo isn't in KMH?
Have they moved Snowden to Wiltshire then?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users