Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Spax Coilover Conversion, Do I Take Off The Cones?


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

#1 chezz565

chezz565

    Starting My Mini Up

  • Noobies
  • Pip
  • 4 posts
  • Location: Cheshire

Posted 11 November 2010 - 11:41 PM

Please help, I am converting my rusty shock brackets to the upgraded coilover brackets so I am fitting the coilovers too. I am welding 2 large 2mm mild steel plates over the rust and holes where the old shock absorbers brackets snapped off. Using upgraded bolts and nuts to screw them on. I am having to take off the rubber cones to prevent them melting during welding.......
Type of car :

Classic mini sports pack

Year :

2000 (W reg)

Description of problem :

I am wondering if I should just use the coilovers and dismantle the cones and leave them off, just running on the coilovers? Can they take the weight? will it be safe? The other option is to buy the smootha ride kit and fit it with the coilovers, is this a better option?

Thanks

At work alot, so e-mail address is [email protected] and mobile number for texting me : 07738 119468



Need to get this car back on the road ASAP!!!! AGHHHH help me please? lol :(

Joe
[/size]

#2 Ethel

Ethel

    ..is NOT a girl!

  • TMF Team
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,919 posts
  • Local Club: none

Posted 11 November 2010 - 11:57 PM

If you manage to melt the cones by welding shocker mounts you'll have more to worry about than toasted rubber - it would mean you've put an immense amount of heat in. Coilovers are springs to replace the rubber springs you won't want both fitted.

#3 Pooky

Pooky

    Crazy About Mini's

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,691 posts
  • Location: Sunny Sussex

Posted 12 November 2010 - 07:08 AM

I am welding 2 large 2mm mild steel plates over the rust


Please make sure you treat this rust before re-inforcing the area!! >_<

#4 Bungle

Bungle

    Original Spamster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 28,971 posts
  • Location: Cornwall
  • Local Club: cornish mini club

Posted 12 November 2010 - 07:32 AM

treat it :) more like cut it out >_<

#5 Dan

Dan

    On Sabbatical

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,354 posts

Posted 12 November 2010 - 08:50 AM

You can't fit 2 different sets of road springs! Or bumpstops for that matter. No offence but do you even understand the conversion you are making?

#6 TopCatCustom

TopCatCustom

    Previously known as C4NN0N.

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,134 posts

Posted 12 November 2010 - 10:06 AM

>_<

#7 Tommyboy12

Tommyboy12

    Up Into Fourth

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,253 posts
  • Location: Peterborough

Posted 12 November 2010 - 10:26 AM

I hope your planning on converting the rears to coilovers too? You cant safely run coilovers at the front and cones at the back. They have different spring rates and will really upset the ride. You also need to re-inforce the areas properly. The shock mounts arent designed to take the full load of the car through them. Thats what the cones do! You will end up damaging your inner wings.

#8 mk3cortina

mk3cortina

    Super Mini Mad

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 677 posts

Posted 12 November 2010 - 11:12 AM

with coilovers i welded 3mm plate over where the top damper mountings are and about 20mm larger than the coilover mounting to spread the stress into the inner wing. really though if you are asking these questions then you shouldnt be messing with this.

#9 Pooky

Pooky

    Crazy About Mini's

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,691 posts
  • Location: Sunny Sussex

Posted 12 November 2010 - 12:13 PM

treat it :dontgetit: more like cut it out :)


Treat it to a session with Mr Angle Grinder! >_<

#10 Cooperman

Cooperman

    Uncle Cooperman, Voted Mr TMF 2011

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,276 posts
  • Location: Cambs.
  • Local Club: MCR, HAMOC, Chelmsford M.C.

Posted 12 November 2010 - 01:17 PM

I'm from the old school and firmly believe that the rubber cones were one of the most brilliant designs ever and helped to make the Mini what it is. They are truly 'variable rate' springs.

#11 Yoda

Yoda

    Camshaft & Stage Two Head

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,958 posts
  • Location: Dartford, Kent
  • Local Club: Medway mini club

Posted 12 November 2010 - 01:22 PM

I'm from the old school and firmly believe that the rubber cones were one of the most brilliant designs ever and helped to make the Mini what it is. They are truly 'variable rate' springs.


Ditto

+1

#12 Ethel

Ethel

    ..is NOT a girl!

  • TMF Team
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 25,919 posts
  • Local Club: none

Posted 12 November 2010 - 01:34 PM

I see what Dilligaf is saying & I suppose my original answer is a little ambiguous - coilovers replace the function of the rubber springs, but not literally in the same location & aren't to be confused with the metal springs that do, like Minitastic's.

I'd agree with the others that rubber cones take some beating on a road going Mini.

#13 ian2000t

ian2000t

    Mini Mad

  • Noobies
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 111 posts
  • Location: Halesowen
  • Local Club: Splinters Mini Club

Posted 12 November 2010 - 02:02 PM

I'm from the old school and firmly believe that the rubber cones were one of the most brilliant designs ever and helped to make the Mini what it is. They are truly 'variable rate' springs.


Ditto

+1


If that is the case why do so many people rate the Minitastic spring conversions?

Also, metal springs last a lot longer than the rubber cones that sag!

#14 Cooperman

Cooperman

    Uncle Cooperman, Voted Mr TMF 2011

  • TMF+ Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,276 posts
  • Location: Cambs.
  • Local Club: MCR, HAMOC, Chelmsford M.C.

Posted 12 November 2010 - 02:14 PM

I think more people rate the rubber cones. Remember, coil spring conversions are a waqy for certain component sales companies to increase their revenues by selling stuff that is not necessarily any better than the original, but suits those who are prepared to spend on parts they see advertised.
My rally 'S' has the same rubber springs as it had when I prepared it over 15 years ago and it's done 32 rallies, some really rough in the forests. The cones were top quality when bought. It's the 'cheapie' ones which sag, not the proper originals.
What are the so-called advantages of coil springs over variable-rate rubber springs? A coil-spring can coil-bind, whilst a rubber spring just gets higher-rate at high deflection levels.

#15 Yoda

Yoda

    Camshaft & Stage Two Head

  • Traders
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,958 posts
  • Location: Dartford, Kent
  • Local Club: Medway mini club

Posted 12 November 2010 - 05:15 PM

Some people prefer the coil replacement over cones purely for a more comfortable smoother ride, I have used both and definitly noticed a lack of performance when driving hard. I have now opted for yellow spot rubbers for my fun car and standard rubbers for my daily.

also dont confuse coil replacements for coilovers which can make a difference but more so for track racing where you dont see bumps, holes and tree stumps.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users