
Best Shock Absorbers?
#16
Posted 11 October 2010 - 08:35 PM
#17
Posted 11 October 2010 - 08:55 PM

They are superb! easy to adjust for both ride height and damping. A huge improvement on the standard rubber suspension.
#18
Posted 21 October 2010 - 01:46 PM
I wouldn't use Spax if I'm being honest. They went bust about 18 months ago and since then, the quality of there stuff is crap, its all cheap chinese crap now, they are owned by some halfords style company now. Says it all.
I would go with either protech or Avo, the only trouble with Protech is that the alumium will go a funny colour with the rain and salt on our roads.
Hi
Spax are still the best product with reliability second to none and still in business and have been for 50 years and a truly great British Company with all dampers built on site in the heart of the cotswolds Bicester in the UK and absolutly nothing to do with Halfords or China
#19
Posted 21 October 2010 - 02:05 PM
I have to agree with the comments on adjustable suspension on road cars. The original suspension was an excellent design. The geometry works really well in real life situations. I would suggest going through the components and replacing anything than is not up to scratch.... bushings, subframe mounts, cones, dampers, etc. Use good quality standard parts and the ride and handling will be transformed to the point you won't recognise the car! The ride height will be high, but this is fine. It allows the suspension to do what it's designed for without bouncing off the bump stops all the time which is what happens with lowered cars on the road. I'd go so far as to say, a factory ride height car will out handle a lowered car on the bumpy roads we have today. If you plan on using it on the track, it's a different story though.
#20
Posted 21 October 2010 - 06:43 PM
#21
Posted 21 October 2010 - 07:10 PM
My concern with the coil-overs is that all the suspension loads are being put through the shell jn a place that wasn't designed for it. The loads seen from the dampers is next to nothing when they are set correctly (i.e. not wound up to 'shake your teeth out' setting!). The standard cones obviously send the main suspension forces through the subframes.
I have to agree with the comments on adjustable suspension on road cars. The original suspension was an excellent design. The geometry works really well in real life situations. I would suggest going through the components and replacing anything than is not up to scratch.... bushings, subframe mounts, cones, dampers, etc. Use good quality standard parts and the ride and handling will be transformed to the point you won't recognise the car! The ride height will be high, but this is fine. It allows the suspension to do what it's designed for without bouncing off the bump stops all the time which is what happens with lowered cars on the road. I'd go so far as to say, a factory ride height car will out handle a lowered car on the bumpy roads we have today. If you plan on using it on the track, it's a different story though.
Agree 100% on all that.
You just can't beat the brilliant rubber cone suspension which made the Mini probably the first-ever production car with true variable-rate springs. The only problem, which is understandable really, is the short suspension travel even at standard ride height. Every lowered Mini I have ever driven has been a nightmare on a bumpy road.
Coil springs or coil-overs may be great for the race-track where it is ultra-smooth, but are no advantage on the public roads of the UK where it is quite bumpy.
#22
Posted 21 October 2010 - 08:04 PM
I also agree with these comments, However having fitted new genuine rubber dohnuts on my mini and then fiting coilovers six weeks later, I personaly prefer the smoother ride. The standard rubber suspension will undoubtedly provide sharper handling but I dont think you loose too much with coilovers. And the adjustability is fab.My concern with the coil-overs is that all the suspension loads are being put through the shell jn a place that wasn't designed for it. The loads seen from the dampers is next to nothing when they are set correctly (i.e. not wound up to 'shake your teeth out' setting!). The standard cones obviously send the main suspension forces through the subframes.
I have to agree with the comments on adjustable suspension on road cars. The original suspension was an excellent design. The geometry works really well in real life situations. I would suggest going through the components and replacing anything than is not up to scratch.... bushings, subframe mounts, cones, dampers, etc. Use good quality standard parts and the ride and handling will be transformed to the point you won't recognise the car! The ride height will be high, but this is fine. It allows the suspension to do what it's designed for without bouncing off the bump stops all the time which is what happens with lowered cars on the road. I'd go so far as to say, a factory ride height car will out handle a lowered car on the bumpy roads we have today. If you plan on using it on the track, it's a different story though.
Agree 100% on all that.
You just can't beat the brilliant rubber cone suspension which made the Mini probably the first-ever production car with true variable-rate springs. The only problem, which is understandable really, is the short suspension travel even at standard ride height. Every lowered Mini I have ever driven has been a nightmare on a bumpy road.
Coil springs or coil-overs may be great for the race-track where it is ultra-smooth, but are no advantage on the public roads of the UK where it is quite bumpy.
Edit:: As for the mounting points, I welded a large 3mm galv plate over the existing mounting area.
Edited by AndyMiniMad., 21 October 2010 - 08:08 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users