
Mg Metro Engine Power Output
#1
Posted 12 May 2010 - 07:44 PM
I've been offered an MG metro engine to transplant in place of my somewhat poorly 1275 (carb with CAT) 1993 mini sprite unit. Would the MG Metro engine offer any improvement in performance/ power over my standard 1275 engine, or is it basically the same unit?
Cheers
Dave
#2
Posted 12 May 2010 - 07:47 PM
#3
Posted 12 May 2010 - 07:55 PM
It's basially the same unit, but the MG Metro had a head with bigger inlet valves, up to 35.5 mm from 33.6 mm and a far better cam. In fat the MG Metro cam is often regarded as the finest cam ever produced for the a-series engine in prodution form. Nominally an MG Metro engine gives, I believe, 73 bhp at the flywheel.
your forgeting the alloy rocker cover!
good info there^^

#4
Posted 12 May 2010 - 09:59 PM
#5
Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:16 PM
Sorry to hyjack, but I I have an early leaded MG engine that is in good order what could I do to optimise it 1.5 rollers ?Only the early 'leaded' engine had the larger inlet valve. When it went unleaded - the standard valve size head was used. The MG engine does have higher compression ratio though - by use of slightly taller pistons that come right to the top of the block. And that MG cam is indeed very good - and without having super high lift which soon wears out the valve train!
#6
Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:23 PM
#7
Posted 12 May 2010 - 10:29 PM
Thanks, is it worth changing the timing chain and getting a vernier set up?The rockers may give you 1 extra bhp........... To improve it - same as any other engine - flow the head and optimise the ignition timing and the carb settings - including 'Vizardising' the carb!
#8
Posted 13 May 2010 - 06:34 AM
i'll post up the results later on

#9
Posted 13 May 2010 - 10:42 AM
results are:
max power - 81.1bhp @ 5429rpm(flywheel)
65.5bhp (wheels)
max torque - 86.2lb/f @ 4299rpm
pretty happy all in all, but on the second power run the fan exploded into loads of pieces! we think it sucked the breather hose into it causing all 11 blades to fly off and maximum rpm!! ouch.
no bad though for a nearly standard 1275 mg metro engine.
#10
Posted 13 May 2010 - 11:39 AM
Excellent.just got back,
results are:
max power - 81.1bhp @ 5429rpm(flywheel)
65.5bhp (wheels)
max torque - 86.2lb/f @ 4299rpm
pretty happy all in all, but on the second power run the fan exploded into loads of pieces! we think it sucked the breather hose into it causing all 11 blades to fly off and maximum rpm!! ouch.
no bad though for a nearly standard 1275 mg metro engine.
I hope mine is as strong as yours.
#11
Posted 29 November 2011 - 12:18 AM
does mileage on the engine account for anything, as i heard that the engine slowly looses it bhp over time,
mine is mg metro one and it has 32K on it XD which im chuffed with!
and it has a kent 276 cam in it,
what do you reckon it will be as im getting it RR'd this thursday
#12
Posted 29 November 2011 - 12:24 AM
#13
Posted 29 November 2011 - 07:56 AM
#14
Posted 29 November 2011 - 10:03 AM
I have only ever raced minis on the circuit, in historic , mini 7 and club cars
I just recently purchased a mini for raod use and was suprised how well the mg metro engine went
have just modified it a bit and balanced engine and thet cam is soooo good with lots of torque from low down
it realy does go well with keeping the revs down unlike a race car
#15
Posted 29 November 2011 - 10:24 AM
The Cooper S 1275 engine was produced from sept '67 to '70
The MG Metro was produced in '82
Thats a 15 year design gap....
Think of how much the engine tech changes and how much they find out in 15 years.
Plus the fact that the Metro was 2 years into its production and had not proved nearly as successful as what it intended to replace .... our beloved mini....
With a 15 year engine development advantage and a need to rebrand a so far failing car I'm not surprised at all...
Jesus
Edited by twrminisport, 29 November 2011 - 10:31 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users