
GW Does quickshift consumer testing...
#31
Posted 18 October 2005 - 06:22 PM
#32
Posted 18 October 2005 - 07:41 PM
#33
Posted 23 October 2005 - 11:46 AM
I had exactly the same problem with one of these that i bought second hand (was never fitted though)Cool, it actually went in.. but then I noticed that the screw top was not just sitting on the top where it needed screwing in to secure...
No.... it was actually resting on the nylon dome of the selector mechanism, someones got their dimensions wrong..
The distance between the top of the socket and the rod, is less than the length of the gear lever.... oopsie
Basically, i have solved the problem in two ways:
The little white nylon ball at the end of the shifter needs a bit of sanding down to make it slightly smaller but make sure it is kept smooth - i used a dremel tool for this.
The nylon dome at the top of the selector mechanism needs a fair bit grinding off the bottom of it for which i used a dremel again - you will notice that there is a recess in the centre to allow for room for the weld on the metal flange it sits on - this will no longer be effective, so i ground the weld down to sort this out so the nylon dome sits flush on the mechanism.
You have to get it so that the plate which screws into the top will tighten against the housing without pushing onto the nylon dome, just locating onto it - this means that it will take several grinding attempts to get it just right - you dont want to take too much off and make it all loose in there!
Anyway, smear everything in grease especially the nylon ball and dome and tighten the screw top right up on the housing and bob's your uncle
The shifter works very well and i cant believe it can be any better with a more expensive unit such as a genuine kad, but you certainly get what you pay for in terms of manufacturing accuracy and expect to do a lot of work to get the cheap one right - took me about 4 hours in total - not bad for a 20 min job!
Cheers
Paul
#34
Posted 23 October 2005 - 12:08 PM
I guess therein is the issue then....The shifter works very well and i cant believe it can be any better with a more expensive unit such as a genuine kad, but you certainly get what you pay for in terms of manufacturing accuracy and expect to do a lot of work to get the cheap one right - took me about 4 hours in total - not bad for a 20 min job!
It took 4 hours to fit the quickshift. Lets assume I paid a garage to fit it, and they charged £40/hour labour (which is quite cheap these days). That £160 labour plus the £29.99 price of the quickshift.
Fitting it at home doesn't cost you any money, but it does cost you time...
I'd rather pay £90 and take 20mins to fit it if I'm quite honest, hence why I got the KAD one.
#35
Posted 23 October 2005 - 01:00 PM
a garage would probably not go to the trouble of modifying something to fit either - they would just tell you to send it back!
at the end of the day you get what you pay for - proper testing and R&D costs money to develop a product - that is why the kad is more money - because its been tested and it works (from what i have read on here anyway).
whoever made this one has neglected to show it to a car, let alone fit it to one before offering it for sale
#36
Posted 23 October 2005 - 01:33 PM
#37
Posted 23 October 2005 - 03:48 PM
#38
Posted 23 October 2005 - 05:06 PM
it will be interesting to hear what the supplier of GW's 'guinea pig' stick says....
#39
Posted 23 October 2005 - 07:30 PM
i for one would be very interested to hear the explanation!it will be interesting to hear what the supplier of GW's 'guinea pig' stick says....
mine is the exact same stick
#40
Posted 03 January 2006 - 09:10 AM
Still not got one which works correctly though
So at the moment, the GW consumer test still points towards KAD as the 5 Star option
#41
Posted 03 January 2006 - 12:12 PM
as for spending £90 on a quickshift, have a go with one and youll want to buy one.
edit: genuine KAD shifter below

#42
Posted 03 January 2006 - 12:59 PM
Tom
#43
Posted 03 January 2006 - 01:10 PM
Guy.
#44
Posted 03 January 2006 - 01:16 PM
The work on the princple of moving the pivot point of the lever further up, therefore less movement at the top to produce the same movement at the bottom..
It does not make it shift gears any quicker, and quite frankly if you do try to and don't get the clutch right, you're going to be seing me for a new gearbox soon after :cheese:, so why they call it a quickshift I don't know, but does reduce the amount of travel on the shift.
#45
Posted 03 January 2006 - 01:47 PM
I would only probably switch over if I tried someone elses and it was nice to use.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users