PMSL - Good spot !!!!clicky
you had better tell this lot that it didn't happen and they dreamt it
Check the date of that thread mate, DVLA wont just turn up and wont check every VW in a fixed area
Bungle - the player got played I think!!!! Lol
Posted 01 April 2010 - 09:06 PM
Feel free to ignore his advice then, whether that link was an April Fools joke or not, the situation is definitly not a joke.PMSL - Good spot !!!!clicky
you had better tell this lot that it didn't happen and they dreamt it
Check the date of that thread mate, DVLA wont just turn up and wont check every VW in a fixed area
Bungle - the player got played I think!!!! Lol
Posted 01 April 2010 - 10:33 PM
Posted 01 April 2010 - 10:39 PM
Edited by garrett3, 01 April 2010 - 10:44 PM.
Posted 02 April 2010 - 10:35 AM
Sorry Garrett, it was more directed at mk3 cooper s, referring to Bungle as a "player" when he's just trying to help.No its not a joke, But that thread was, Dont read too much into things
Posted 02 October 2010 - 04:15 PM
Posted 02 October 2010 - 04:20 PM
Posted 02 October 2010 - 04:40 PM
will this new law affect bulk head mods for say carbs ect
Monococque.
Q) What is the definition of a monococque ?
A) A design in which body and chassis are all one unit.
Q) Why does cutting into a monococque affect the vehicle identity if it retains the same shape /profile as before.
A) Cutting is considered to be modifying the vehicle from its original specification. Any modification to the chassis/monocoque body is considered to render the vehicle no longer original specification or of original identity.
Q) Is it acceptable to modify a vehicle bulkhead and/or transmission tunnel when performing an engine change or fitting another make?
A) No, Assuming this is in relation to a monocoque structure. This would be considered a modification to the structure.
Posted 02 October 2010 - 05:15 PM
What constitutes a monocoque is that of how an OEM manufacturer would view it. The chassis or `cage` assembly and all components that form it, less any cosmetic panels or infills that make no structural consideration to the monocoque or its component parts.
However, we must emphasis that this information is given for general guidance and each case will be judged on its merits
Posted 02 October 2010 - 05:16 PM
What constitutes a monocoque is that of how an OEM manufacturer would view it. The chassis or `cage` assembly and all components that form it, less any cosmetic panels or infills that make no structural consideration to the monocoque or its component parts.
However, we must emphasis that this information is given for general guidance and each case will be judged on its merits
You have to make your own decision of what that means.
Posted 02 October 2010 - 05:27 PM
Posted 21 January 2011 - 11:50 PM
I've put this topic together as a summary suitable for pinning.
Please make suggestions if you think it needs altering or adding to. but bear in mind it needs to be concise and as factual as possible . Perhaps the easiest method would be to edit the existing text using a different colour for any alterations you suggest. - Or write a short reply if it's a commentary or 1st hand report on dealing with the issues.
Thanks again to Craig and Garrett who've done the real work on this.
Posted 21 January 2011 - 11:52 PM
how i understand the test it only applies/needed to cars 10 years old or younger therefore if your modifications are to mot standard then they are fineat the end of the day, if i want to modify mine i will, but i will not offer it for an iva at my own free will, unless im forced to.
Posted 22 January 2011 - 12:14 AM
I do actually know someone who had a very nicely rebuilt Land Rover crushed by VOSA because it didn't comply. It does happen. He was reported to them by his MOT inspector without his knowledge, the car passed the test and got a certificate, then VOSA sent him a letter asking him to present for a VIC check a couple of weeks later and it never left the inspection station. Not as a car anyway...
Posted 25 March 2011 - 03:19 PM
0 members, 9 guests, 0 anonymous users